Scientific traditions as a mechanism for forming continuity in the development of psychological cognition. Part 1. Status and difficulties in studying

The relevance of the problem of scientific traditions and continuity of psychological knowledge as an important issue in the methodology of modern psychology is considered and substantiated. An analysis of the definitions and understanding of the term “tradition” in the developments of psychologists and related specialists is given, the main difficulties in deployment of research in this area and their problem field are outlined. The paradoxical nature in the study of traditions is indicated — the recognition of its relevance and importance for understanding the dynamics of psychological knowledge, as well as fixation of the need for development and, at the same time, a small number of modern special publications on this topic. Often publications that use the term “tradition” in their titles characterize it only indirectly and rather generally, and sometimes imply a completely different phenomenon under study. It is concluded that the problems of traditions in Russian psychology mostly have the character of unexpressed, unreflected knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psikhologicheskii zhurnal
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31857/s0205959224030014
Primary Topic
Human Health and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific traditions as a mechanism for forming continuity in the development of psychological cognition. Part 1. Status and difficulties in studying

А. Л. Журавлев, Yu. N. Оleinik
Psikhologicheskii zhurnal
Human Health and Disease
article

Scientific traditions as a mechanism for forming continuity in the development of psychological cognition. Part 1. Status and difficulties in studying

А. Л. Журавлев, Yu. N. Оleinik
article en

Abstract

The relevance of the problem of scientific traditions and continuity of psychological knowledge as an important issue in the methodology of modern psychology is considered and substantiated. An analysis of the definitions and understanding of the term “tradition” in the developments of psychologists and related specialists is given, the main difficulties in deployment of research in this area and their problem field are outlined. The paradoxical nature in the study of traditions is indicated — the recognition of its relevance and importance for understanding the dynamics of psychological knowledge, as well as fixation of the need for development and, at the same time, a small number of modern special publications on this topic. Often publications that use the term “tradition” in their titles characterize it only indirectly and rather generally, and sometimes imply a completely different phenomenon under study. It is concluded that the problems of traditions in Russian psychology mostly have the character of unexpressed, unreflected knowledge.

Psikhologicheskii zhurnalVol. 45(3)
Institute of Psychology (RU), Moscow University for the Humanities (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Human Health and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.