BAX and DDB2 as biomarkers for acute radiation exposure in the human blood ex vivo and non-human primate models

There are currently no available FDA-cleared biodosimetry tools for rapid and accurate assessment of absorbed radiation dose following a radiation/nuclear incident. Previously we developed a protein biomarker-based FAST-DOSE bioassay system for biodosimetry. The aim of this study was to integrate an ELISA platform with two high-performing FAST-DOSE biomarkers, BAX and DDB2, and to construct machine learning models that employ a multiparametric biomarker strategy for enhancing the accuracy of exposure classification and radiation dose prediction. The bioassay showed 97.92% and 96% accuracy in classifying samples in human and non-human primate (NHP) blood samples exposed ex vivo to 0-5 Gy X-rays, respectively up to 48 h after exposure, and an adequate correlation between reconstructed and actual dose in the human samples (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.79, RMSE = 0.80 Gy, and MAE = 0.63 Gy) and NHP (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.80, RMSE = 0.78 Gy, and MAE = 0.61 Gy). Biomarker measurements in vivo from four NHPs exposed to a single 2.5 Gy total body dose showed a persistent upregulation in blood samples collected on days 2 and 5 after irradiation. The data indicates that using a combined approach of targeted proteins can increase bioassay sensitivity and provide a more accurate dose prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69852-z
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Effects of Radiation Exposure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BAX and DDB2 as biomarkers for acute radiation exposure in the human blood ex vivo and non-human primate models

Norman J. Kleiman, Karthik Kanagaraj, George W. Schaaf, Igor Shuryak et al.
4 citations
Scientific Reports
Effects of Radiation Exposure
1.62
article

BAX and DDB2 as biomarkers for acute radiation exposure in the human blood ex vivo and non-human primate models

Norman J. Kleiman, Karthik Kanagaraj, George W. Schaaf, Igor Shuryak, John D. Olson, J. Mark Cline, Helen C. Turner, Michelle A. Phillippi, E. Ober
article en
4 citations

Abstract

There are currently no available FDA-cleared biodosimetry tools for rapid and accurate assessment of absorbed radiation dose following a radiation/nuclear incident. Previously we developed a protein biomarker-based FAST-DOSE bioassay system for biodosimetry. The aim of this study was to integrate an ELISA platform with two high-performing FAST-DOSE biomarkers, BAX and DDB2, and to construct machine learning models that employ a multiparametric biomarker strategy for enhancing the accuracy of exposure classification and radiation dose prediction. The bioassay showed 97.92% and 96% accuracy in classifying samples in human and non-human primate (NHP) blood samples exposed ex vivo to 0-5 Gy X-rays, respectively up to 48 h after exposure, and an adequate correlation between reconstructed and actual dose in the human samples (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.79, RMSE = 0.80 Gy, and MAE = 0.63 Gy) and NHP (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.80, RMSE = 0.78 Gy, and MAE = 0.61 Gy). Biomarker measurements in vivo from four NHPs exposed to a single 2.5 Gy total body dose showed a persistent upregulation in blood samples collected on days 2 and 5 after irradiation. The data indicates that using a combined approach of targeted proteins can increase bioassay sensitivity and provide a more accurate dose prediction.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Effects of Radiation Exposure
1.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.