Durability of Aortic Homografts in Pulmonary Atresia and Major Aortopulmonary Collateral Arteries

<b>Objectives:</b> It is well-known that right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery homograft conduit durability is worse for smaller conduits and smaller/younger patients. However, there is limited literature on age and conduit-size specific outcomes, or on the role of conduit oversizing. <b>Methods:</b> Patients diagnosed with tetralogy of Fallot and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries undergoing right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction with a valved aortic homograft conduit from November 2001 through March 2023, at our institution were included. Conduits were grouped and evaluated by diameter, diameter Z-score, and patient age at implant. The primary time-related outcome was freedom from RVOT reintervention. Factors associated with freedom from time-related outcomes were assessed with univariable Cox regression analysis. <b>Results:</b> A total of 863 RVOT conduits were implanted in 722 patients. On multivariable analysis, younger age, male sex, Alagille syndrome, smaller diameter of the conduit, and smaller Z-score were associated with shorter freedom from reintervention. Among patients with smaller diameter conduits, larger Z-scores were associated with longer freedom from conduit reintervention (<i>P</i> < .001). Transcatheter interventions were commonly used to extend conduit lifespan across ages and conduit sizes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Larger conduit diameter, older age, and higher conduit Z-score were associated with longer freedom from reintervention in patients undergoing RVOT reconstruction in this cohort. Oversizing of conduits, even beyond a Z-score of 4, is generally appropriate.