Group sequential designs for clinical trials when the maximum sample size is uncertain

Motivated by the experience of COVID-19 trials, we consider clinical trials in the setting of an emerging disease in which the uncertainty of natural disease course and potential treatment effects makes advance specification of a sample size challenging. One approach to such a challenge is to use a group sequential design to allow the trial to stop on the basis of interim analysis results as soon as a conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the treatment under investigation can be reached. As such a trial may be halted before a formal stopping boundary is reached, we consider the final analysis under such a scenario, proposing alternative methods for when the decision to halt the trial is made with or without knowledge of interim analysis results. We address the problems of ensuring that the type I error rate neither exceeds nor falls unnecessarily far below the nominal level. We also propose methods in which there is no maximum sample size, the trial continuing either until the stopping boundary is reached or it is decided to halt the trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Statistics in Medicine
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10203
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Group sequential designs for clinical trials when the maximum sample size is uncertain

Lori E. Dodd, Thomas Jaki, Peter Horby, Nigel Stallard et al.
1 links
Statistics in Medicine
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Group sequential designs for clinical trials when the maximum sample size is uncertain

Lori E. Dodd, Thomas Jaki, Peter Horby, Nigel Stallard, Amin Yarahmadi
article en

Abstract

Motivated by the experience of COVID-19 trials, we consider clinical trials in the setting of an emerging disease in which the uncertainty of natural disease course and potential treatment effects makes advance specification of a sample size challenging. One approach to such a challenge is to use a group sequential design to allow the trial to stop on the basis of interim analysis results as soon as a conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the treatment under investigation can be reached. As such a trial may be halted before a formal stopping boundary is reached, we consider the final analysis under such a scenario, proposing alternative methods for when the decision to halt the trial is made with or without knowledge of interim analysis results. We address the problems of ensuring that the type I error rate neither exceeds nor falls unnecessarily far below the nominal level. We also propose methods in which there is no maximum sample size, the trial continuing either until the stopping boundary is reached or it is decided to halt the trial.

Statistics in MedicineVol. 43(24)
OTH Regensburg (DE), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Oxford (GB), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (US), MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB), University of Regensburg (DE)
Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Group sequential designs for clinical trials when the maximum sample size is uncertain — Lori E. Dodd, Thomas Jaki, et al. · Statistics in Medicine (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS