Predicting progression‐free survival from measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Association between measurable residual disease (MRD) and survival outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has often been reported. However, limited quantitative analyses over large datasets have been undertaken to establish the predictive power of MRD. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of published MRD data to explore the utility of MRD in the prediction of progression-free survival (PFS). We undertook two independent analyses, which leveraged available published data to address two complimentary questions. In the first, data from eight clinical trials was modeled via a meta-regression approach, showing that median PFS can be predicted from undetectable MRD rates at 3-6 months of post-treatment. The resulting model can be used to predict the probability of technical success of a planned clinical trial in chemotherapy. In the second, we investigated the evidence for predicting PFS from competing MRD metrics, for example baseline value and instantaneous MRD value, via a joint modeling approach. Using data from four small studies, we found strong evidence that including MRD metrics in joint models improves predictions of PFS compared with not including them. This analysis suggests that incorporating MRD is likely to better inform individual progression predictions. It is therefore proposed that systematic MRD collection should be accompanied by modeling to generate algorithms that inform patients' progression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Translational Science
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13905
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting progression‐free survival from measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Holly Kimko, Shringi Sharma, Giovanni Di Veroli, F. Tettamanti
1 citations
Clinical and Translational Science
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
0.44
article

Predicting progression‐free survival from measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Holly Kimko, Shringi Sharma, Giovanni Di Veroli, F. Tettamanti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Association between measurable residual disease (MRD) and survival outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has often been reported. However, limited quantitative analyses over large datasets have been undertaken to establish the predictive power of MRD. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of published MRD data to explore the utility of MRD in the prediction of progression-free survival (PFS). We undertook two independent analyses, which leveraged available published data to address two complimentary questions. In the first, data from eight clinical trials was modeled via a meta-regression approach, showing that median PFS can be predicted from undetectable MRD rates at 3-6 months of post-treatment. The resulting model can be used to predict the probability of technical success of a planned clinical trial in chemotherapy. In the second, we investigated the evidence for predicting PFS from competing MRD metrics, for example baseline value and instantaneous MRD value, via a joint modeling approach. Using data from four small studies, we found strong evidence that including MRD metrics in joint models improves predictions of PFS compared with not including them. This analysis suggests that incorporating MRD is likely to better inform individual progression predictions. It is therefore proposed that systematic MRD collection should be accompanied by modeling to generate algorithms that inform patients' progression.

Clinical and Translational ScienceVol. 17(8)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), Quantitative BioSciences (US), AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
AstraZeneca
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
0.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.