Open-Face Masks in Radiotherapy: Enhancing Therapeutic Strategies for Head and Neck and Brain Cancer Patients—A Comprehensive Scoping Review

<b>Introduction</b>: The main goal of radiotherapy (RT) is to deliver a precise dose to the target while sparing the surrounding normal tissue and minimizing side effects. Appropriate patient immobilization is crucial, especially for head and neck cancer (HNC) and Brain Cancer (BC). Conventional closed-face masks (CFMs), while effective in minimizing head motion, can cause significant discomfort, anxiety, and claustrophobia. Open-face masks (OFMs) have been developed to increase patient comfort while providing precise immobilization. <b>Methods:</b> Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews and the Arskey and O'Malley framework, an electronic search of EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science was conducted to identify original studies reporting the use and description of OFMs in clinical practice up to April 2024. The inclusion criteria were English-language articles focusing on OFMs for HNC and BC patients undergoing RT. <b>Results:</b> Of 618 titles, 19 articles fulfilled the selection criteria. Most studies were comparative (<i>n</i> = 13) or observational (<i>n</i> = 6). The articles were categorized by treatment site, resulting in three groups: BC (<i>n</i> = 14, 68.4%), HNC (<i>n</i> = 4, 21.4%), and mixed (<i>n</i> = 2, 10.5%), which includes both BC and HNC. Of note, 82.4% (<i>n</i> = 16) of the included studies were published from 2020 onwards, emphasizing the recent adoption of OFM in clinical practice. <b>Conclusions</b>: The reviewed studies show that OFMs, in combination with SGRT, offer significant advantages in terms of patient comfort and positioning accuracy in HNC and BC treatments. Reproducibility in the sub-millimeter and sub-degree range can be achieved, which supports the use of OFMs in clinical practice. Future research should explore innovative combinations of immobilization and monitoring to further improve RT outcomes and ensure precise treatment while increasing patient comfort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16162899
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Open-Face Masks in Radiotherapy: Enhancing Therapeutic Strategies for Head and Neck and Brain Cancer Patients—A Comprehensive Scoping Review

Ilaria Monaco, S. Pallotta, Isacco Desideri, Daniele Giansanti et al.
8 citations
Cancers
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
4.86
article

Open-Face Masks in Radiotherapy: Enhancing Therapeutic Strategies for Head and Neck and Brain Cancer Patients—A Comprehensive Scoping Review

Ilaria Monaco, S. Pallotta, Isacco Desideri, Daniele Giansanti, Claudio Votta, L. Marrazzo, Pierluigi Bonomo, Patrizia Cornacchione, Ilaria Morelli, Viola Salvestrini, Andrea Lastrucci, Irene Maran, Nicola Iosca, Yannick Wandael, Renzo Ricci, Lorenzo Livi
article en
8 citations

Abstract

<b>Introduction</b>: The main goal of radiotherapy (RT) is to deliver a precise dose to the target while sparing the surrounding normal tissue and minimizing side effects. Appropriate patient immobilization is crucial, especially for head and neck cancer (HNC) and Brain Cancer (BC). Conventional closed-face masks (CFMs), while effective in minimizing head motion, can cause significant discomfort, anxiety, and claustrophobia. Open-face masks (OFMs) have been developed to increase patient comfort while providing precise immobilization. <b>Methods:</b> Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews and the Arskey and O'Malley framework, an electronic search of EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science was conducted to identify original studies reporting the use and description of OFMs in clinical practice up to April 2024. The inclusion criteria were English-language articles focusing on OFMs for HNC and BC patients undergoing RT. <b>Results:</b> Of 618 titles, 19 articles fulfilled the selection criteria. Most studies were comparative (<i>n</i> = 13) or observational (<i>n</i> = 6). The articles were categorized by treatment site, resulting in three groups: BC (<i>n</i> = 14, 68.4%), HNC (<i>n</i> = 4, 21.4%), and mixed (<i>n</i> = 2, 10.5%), which includes both BC and HNC. Of note, 82.4% (<i>n</i> = 16) of the included studies were published from 2020 onwards, emphasizing the recent adoption of OFM in clinical practice. <b>Conclusions</b>: The reviewed studies show that OFMs, in combination with SGRT, offer significant advantages in terms of patient comfort and positioning accuracy in HNC and BC treatments. Reproducibility in the sub-millimeter and sub-degree range can be achieved, which supports the use of OFMs in clinical practice. Future research should explore innovative combinations of immobilization and monitoring to further improve RT outcomes and ensure precise treatment while increasing patient comfort.

CancersVol. 16(16)
Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Consorziale - Policlinico Bari (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
4.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.