Which would you choose again? Comparison of trapeziometacarpal implant versus resection arthroplasty in the same patient

We invited 14 women who had undergone implant arthroplasty in one thumb and resection-suspension-interposition arthroplasty (RSIA) in the other to a follow-up visit at a median time of 2.2 and 6.2 years after implant and RSIA, respectively. In total, 12 patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome after implant arthroplasty, while eight patients reported this level of satisfaction for RSIA. Of the patients, 10 would choose an implant again, one would choose RSIA and three patients were undecided. The brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score and key pinch and grip strengths were significantly higher at follow-up for the thumb with the implant arthroplasty. Two revision operations were done 1.5 years after RSIA. Patients were satisfied with both procedures, but if they had to choose again, they would prefer implant arthroplasty.<b>Level of evidence:</b> III.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Published
2024-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241265809
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Which would you choose again? Comparison of trapeziometacarpal implant versus resection arthroplasty in the same patient

Miriam Marks, Daniel B. Herren, Viviane Nietlispach, Jenny Imhof et al.
8 citations
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
4.58
article

Which would you choose again? Comparison of trapeziometacarpal implant versus resection arthroplasty in the same patient

Miriam Marks, Daniel B. Herren, Viviane Nietlispach, Jenny Imhof, Tanja Pudic
article en
8 citations

Abstract

We invited 14 women who had undergone implant arthroplasty in one thumb and resection-suspension-interposition arthroplasty (RSIA) in the other to a follow-up visit at a median time of 2.2 and 6.2 years after implant and RSIA, respectively. In total, 12 patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome after implant arthroplasty, while eight patients reported this level of satisfaction for RSIA. Of the patients, 10 would choose an implant again, one would choose RSIA and three patients were undecided. The brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score and key pinch and grip strengths were significantly higher at follow-up for the thumb with the implant arthroplasty. Two revision operations were done 1.5 years after RSIA. Patients were satisfied with both procedures, but if they had to choose again, they would prefer implant arthroplasty.<b>Level of evidence:</b> III.

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)Vol. 50(2)
Schulthess-Klinik (CH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
4.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Which would you choose again? Comparison of trapeziometacarpal implant versus resection arthroplasty in the same patient — Miriam Marks, Daniel B. Herren, et al. · Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS