Endogenous dynamics of denunciation: Evidence from an inquisitorial trial

We develop an endogenous approach to the practice of denunciation, as an alternative to exogenous historical and sociological accounts. It analyzes denunciation as a response to increasing pressure, which in turn increases pressure on social contacts. The research context is the trial of Waldensians in Giaveno, Italy, in 1335, headed by the inquisitor Alberto de Castellario. A dynamic network actor model attests that coercive pressure not only raises the rate of denunciation but also compels denouncers to implicate individuals who are socially closer to them. We find that coercive pressure starts yielding diminishing returns relatively quickly, with the degree of redundancy of information escalating as a result of preferential attachment, increasingly targeting those already denounced by others, publicly announced suspects, and those having absconded from the trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PNAS Nexus
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae340
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endogenous dynamics of denunciation: Evidence from an inquisitorial trial

Stoyan V. Sgourev, José Luis Estévez, Davor Salihović
3 citations
PNAS Nexus
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
0.84
article

Endogenous dynamics of denunciation: Evidence from an inquisitorial trial

Stoyan V. Sgourev, José Luis Estévez, Davor Salihović
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We develop an endogenous approach to the practice of denunciation, as an alternative to exogenous historical and sociological accounts. It analyzes denunciation as a response to increasing pressure, which in turn increases pressure on social contacts. The research context is the trial of Waldensians in Giaveno, Italy, in 1335, headed by the inquisitor Alberto de Castellario. A dynamic network actor model attests that coercive pressure not only raises the rate of denunciation but also compels denouncers to implicate individuals who are socially closer to them. We find that coercive pressure starts yielding diminishing returns relatively quickly, with the degree of redundancy of information escalating as a result of preferential attachment, increasingly targeting those already denounced by others, publicly announced suspects, and those having absconded from the trial.

PNAS NexusVol. 3(9)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Antwerp (BE), Väestöliitto (FI), Jacobs (United States) (US), EM Normandie Business School (FR)
European Commission, Academy of Finland, European Research Council
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
0.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Endogenous dynamics of denunciation: Evidence from an inquisitorial trial — Stoyan V. Sgourev, José Luis Estévez, et al. · PNAS Nexus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS