Environmental Impacts on Behavioral Health Interventions: The Moderating Effect of Neighborhood Deprivation on a Mobile Health Treatment for Depression

Relatively little scholarly attention has been given to incorporating geographic principles into investigations of behavioral health intervention efficacy—where, and why, a behavioral health intervention might be more effective in one place versus another. We address this research gap by leveraging data from a randomized controlled trial in a post-hoc analysis to investigate whether socioeconomic deprivation in the residential neighborhood moderates the efficacy of a text-message-delivered (mHealth) depression intervention targeted toward young adults. Ninety-seven participants were recruited from social media sources, randomly assigned to the treatment or control condition, and assessed for depression symptoms and related outcomes at baseline, one month, two months (immediately following treatment completion), and three months. We find that intervention effects for reducing depression symptoms were stronger among participants residing in neighborhoods with higher, as compared to lower, socioeconomic deprivation (β = −0.208, p = 0.013, 95 percent CI [−0.372, −0.044]). Similarly, stronger intervention effects for enhancing behavioral activation (β = 0.150, p = 0.028, 95 percent CI [0.016, 0.284]) and for reducing cognitive distortion (β = −0.476, p = 0.002, 95 percent CI [−0.777, −0.175]), malleable behaviors and thinking processes intended to lessen depression, were found for residents of higher deprivation neighborhoods. We speculate these results reflect an enhanced ability to intervene in processes of self-regulation among those living in higher deprivation neighborhoods, which might stem from the experience of chronic stress in such settings, thus resulting in greater receptivity to intervention components that reduce depressive symptoms. These findings could facilitate geographic targeting to enhance intervention efficacy and guide geographically informed health interventions tailored to specific environmental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Association of Geographers
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2024.2385395
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Impacts on Behavioral Health Interventions: The Moderating Effect of Neighborhood Deprivation on a Mobile Health Treatment for Depression

Michael A. Russell, J. Douglas Coatsworth, Nikola Zaharakis, Michael J. Mason et al.
1 citations
Annals of the American Association of Geographers
Health disparities and outcomes
0.53
article

Environmental Impacts on Behavioral Health Interventions: The Moderating Effect of Neighborhood Deprivation on a Mobile Health Treatment for Depression

Michael A. Russell, J. Douglas Coatsworth, Nikola Zaharakis, Michael J. Mason, Jeremy Mennis, Aaron Brown
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Relatively little scholarly attention has been given to incorporating geographic principles into investigations of behavioral health intervention efficacy—where, and why, a behavioral health intervention might be more effective in one place versus another. We address this research gap by leveraging data from a randomized controlled trial in a post-hoc analysis to investigate whether socioeconomic deprivation in the residential neighborhood moderates the efficacy of a text-message-delivered (mHealth) depression intervention targeted toward young adults. Ninety-seven participants were recruited from social media sources, randomly assigned to the treatment or control condition, and assessed for depression symptoms and related outcomes at baseline, one month, two months (immediately following treatment completion), and three months. We find that intervention effects for reducing depression symptoms were stronger among participants residing in neighborhoods with higher, as compared to lower, socioeconomic deprivation (β = −0.208, p = 0.013, 95 percent CI [−0.372, −0.044]). Similarly, stronger intervention effects for enhancing behavioral activation (β = 0.150, p = 0.028, 95 percent CI [0.016, 0.284]) and for reducing cognitive distortion (β = −0.476, p = 0.002, 95 percent CI [−0.777, −0.175]), malleable behaviors and thinking processes intended to lessen depression, were found for residents of higher deprivation neighborhoods. We speculate these results reflect an enhanced ability to intervene in processes of self-regulation among those living in higher deprivation neighborhoods, which might stem from the experience of chronic stress in such settings, thus resulting in greater receptivity to intervention components that reduce depressive symptoms. These findings could facilitate geographic targeting to enhance intervention efficacy and guide geographically informed health interventions tailored to specific environmental conditions.

Annals of the American Association of GeographersVol. 114(10)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Kentucky (US), Applied Behavioral Research (United States) (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Temple University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Health disparities and outcomes
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.