Pediatric Assent in Clinical Practice: A Critical Scoping Review

There is widespread agreement that assent is morally valuable, but there remain substantial ambiguities or disagreements about its meaning, process, and ethical justification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2024.2388517
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pediatric Assent in Clinical Practice: A Critical Scoping Review

Jason Adam Wasserman, Abram Brummett, Naomi Laventhal, Mark C. Navin et al.
1 citations
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
1.11
article

Pediatric Assent in Clinical Practice: A Critical Scoping Review

Jason Adam Wasserman, Abram Brummett, Naomi Laventhal, Mark C. Navin, Stephanie Swanberg, Amelia N. Najor, Natalie Liogas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is widespread agreement that assent is morally valuable, but there remain substantial ambiguities or disagreements about its meaning, process, and ethical justification.

AJOB Empirical BioethicsVol. 15(4)
Michigan School of Professional Psychology (US), Oakland University (US), University of Michigan (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.