Bad leadership - Why we steer clear

The article points out that more than a half century into the modern leader continues virtually entirely to ignore, or at least badly to shortchange, the dark side of leadership. Bad leadership - which is, alas, as ubiquitous as pernicious. Given that bad leaders, and their bad followers, are part of everyday life - in companies and countries, and in cultures of every sort - the question is why leadership experts continue to relegate them. Why do we attempt to develop what is good while continuing even now largely to avoid the utterly urgent question of how to stop bad? On the assumption that bad leaders - including for example political leaders drunk on power and corporate leaders drunk on money - are part of the human condition the question is why we still stick our heads in the sand. To this question the article provides four answers - which in a perfect world would point the way toward a study of leadership that is more pragmatic, more grounded in the world as it is as opposed to how we would like it to be.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leadership
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150241272793
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bad leadership - Why we steer clear

Barbara Kellerman
4 citations
Leadership
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
2.57
article

Bad leadership - Why we steer clear

Barbara Kellerman
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The article points out that more than a half century into the modern leader continues virtually entirely to ignore, or at least badly to shortchange, the dark side of leadership. Bad leadership - which is, alas, as ubiquitous as pernicious. Given that bad leaders, and their bad followers, are part of everyday life - in companies and countries, and in cultures of every sort - the question is why leadership experts continue to relegate them. Why do we attempt to develop what is good while continuing even now largely to avoid the utterly urgent question of how to stop bad? On the assumption that bad leaders - including for example political leaders drunk on power and corporate leaders drunk on money - are part of the human condition the question is why we still stick our heads in the sand. To this question the article provides four answers - which in a perfect world would point the way toward a study of leadership that is more pragmatic, more grounded in the world as it is as opposed to how we would like it to be.

LeadershipVol. 20(6)
Harvard University Press (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
2.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.