Spondylolisthesis and Scoliosis Progression and Associated Revision Rates Following Bilateral Lumbar Spine Microscopic Decompression

Lumbar spine microscopic decompression (LSMD) is a common surgical procedure for decompressing neural elements. Although the optimal extent of decompression remains a critical consideration, limited evidence-based guidelines define the threshold for instrumented fusion to maintain biomechanical stability. Existing studies suggest that unilateral LSMD generally does not result in iatrogenic instability. However, the potential instability associated with bilateral segmental decompression (BLSMD) is less well-defined, particularly in patients with pre-existing degenerative lumbar scoliosis (SC) or spondylolisthesis (SL). This retrospective study included patients undergoing BLSMD without instrumented fusion. Pre-existing SC was defined as Cobb's angle ≥10° and SL as any anterior-posterior slip of operated level adjacent vertebral bodies. The primary outcome was new or progressive SC/SL measured on pre and postoperative radiographs. Secondary outcomes were revision rates, changes in Visual Analog Scores (bVAS/lVAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, collected preoperatively and 1-2 years postoperatively. Baseline characteristics such as age, BMI, sex, and number of levels operated were also collected. A total of 31 patients were reviewed comprising 15 female and 16 male patients with a mean age of 61.4 years (21-78) and BMI of 26.5 (18-41). There were 14 one-level, 12 two-level, and 4 three-level BLSMD performed. Patients with pre-existing SC and SL had a 66% and 23% incidence of radiological progression, respectively, compared to 0% in patients without pre-existing deformity. Progression cases were associated with high reoperation rates (up to 75%) and seemed to have inferior clinical outcomes than those without progression. In patients undergoing BLSMD, pre-existing SC/SL is linked to a higher incidence of radiological progression and higher reoperation rates. For patients with SC/SL, careful consideration should be given to limiting decompression, potentially exploring fusion options, and implementing close postoperative radiographic monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine Surgery and Related Research
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2024-0137
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spondylolisthesis and Scoliosis Progression and Associated Revision Rates Following Bilateral Lumbar Spine Microscopic Decompression

Dhivakaran Gengatharan, Craigven Hao Sheng Sim, Hao Bin Chen, Kenneth Zhi Kuan Loi et al.
Spine Surgery and Related Research
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Spondylolisthesis and Scoliosis Progression and Associated Revision Rates Following Bilateral Lumbar Spine Microscopic Decompression

Dhivakaran Gengatharan, Craigven Hao Sheng Sim, Hao Bin Chen, Kenneth Zhi Kuan Loi, Walter-Soon-Yaw Wong, Ashton Kai Shun Tan, Yilun Huang
article en

Abstract

Lumbar spine microscopic decompression (LSMD) is a common surgical procedure for decompressing neural elements. Although the optimal extent of decompression remains a critical consideration, limited evidence-based guidelines define the threshold for instrumented fusion to maintain biomechanical stability. Existing studies suggest that unilateral LSMD generally does not result in iatrogenic instability. However, the potential instability associated with bilateral segmental decompression (BLSMD) is less well-defined, particularly in patients with pre-existing degenerative lumbar scoliosis (SC) or spondylolisthesis (SL). This retrospective study included patients undergoing BLSMD without instrumented fusion. Pre-existing SC was defined as Cobb's angle ≥10° and SL as any anterior-posterior slip of operated level adjacent vertebral bodies. The primary outcome was new or progressive SC/SL measured on pre and postoperative radiographs. Secondary outcomes were revision rates, changes in Visual Analog Scores (bVAS/lVAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, collected preoperatively and 1-2 years postoperatively. Baseline characteristics such as age, BMI, sex, and number of levels operated were also collected. A total of 31 patients were reviewed comprising 15 female and 16 male patients with a mean age of 61.4 years (21-78) and BMI of 26.5 (18-41). There were 14 one-level, 12 two-level, and 4 three-level BLSMD performed. Patients with pre-existing SC and SL had a 66% and 23% incidence of radiological progression, respectively, compared to 0% in patients without pre-existing deformity. Progression cases were associated with high reoperation rates (up to 75%) and seemed to have inferior clinical outcomes than those without progression. In patients undergoing BLSMD, pre-existing SC/SL is linked to a higher incidence of radiological progression and higher reoperation rates. For patients with SC/SL, careful consideration should be given to limiting decompression, potentially exploring fusion options, and implementing close postoperative radiographic monitoring.

Spine Surgery and Related ResearchVol. 9(1)
Singapore General Hospital (SG), SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre (SG), Sengkang General Hospital (SG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.