Reply to “Comment on ‘Ultracold plasma expansion in quadrupole magnetic field' ”

In this Reply, we respond to the Comment by Schlitters et al. on our recent work [Phys. Rev. E 108, 045209 (2023)10.1103/PhysRevE.108.045209], where we present simulation results of ultracold Sr plasma expansion in a quadrupole magnetic field using a molecular-dynamics method. In the Comment, Schlitters et al. present their experimental results, some of which, from their point of view, contradict our simulation results and others that confirm the experiments of Gorman et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 085002 (2021)10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.085002] and our results. In addition, Schlitters et al. also provide results that were not described in our work. Here we show that there is not a contradiction but a misunderstanding of our results. This is due to the fact that simulations allow the use of processing methods that are difficult to obtain in experiment. We also present different simulation results related to expansion velocity variations that reflect the experimental results of Schlitters et al. and provide an explanation for the origin of these variations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. E
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.110.027202
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atomic and Molecular Physics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reply to “Comment on ‘Ultracold plasma expansion in quadrupole magnetic field' ”

E. V. Vikhrov, B. V. Zelener, S. Ya. Bronin, B. B. Zelener
1 citations
Physical review. E
Atomic and Molecular Physics
0.34
article

Reply to “Comment on ‘Ultracold plasma expansion in quadrupole magnetic field' ”

E. V. Vikhrov, B. V. Zelener, S. Ya. Bronin, B. B. Zelener
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this Reply, we respond to the Comment by Schlitters et al. on our recent work [Phys. Rev. E 108, 045209 (2023)10.1103/PhysRevE.108.045209], where we present simulation results of ultracold Sr plasma expansion in a quadrupole magnetic field using a molecular-dynamics method. In the Comment, Schlitters et al. present their experimental results, some of which, from their point of view, contradict our simulation results and others that confirm the experiments of Gorman et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 085002 (2021)10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.085002] and our results. In addition, Schlitters et al. also provide results that were not described in our work. Here we show that there is not a contradiction but a misunderstanding of our results. This is due to the fact that simulations allow the use of processing methods that are difficult to obtain in experiment. We also present different simulation results related to expansion velocity variations that reflect the experimental results of Schlitters et al. and provide an explanation for the origin of these variations.

Physical review. EVol. 110(2)
Joint Institute for High Temperatures (RU)
Russian Science Foundation, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Atomic and Molecular Physics
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reply to “Comment on ‘Ultracold plasma expansion in quadrupole magnetic field' ” — E. V. Vikhrov, B. V. Zelener, et al. · Physical review. E (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS