Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco

Abstract Aim The persistence of large carnivore populations depends on their survival outside protected areas, where they often impact local livelihoods through livestock depredation. Understanding the impacts of human behaviour on large carnivores in shared landscapes is thus important but is often overlooked in habitat assessments or conservation planning. We employed an integrated approach that considers human behaviour and landscape structure metrics to assess the potential for human‐puma ( Puma concolor ) coexistence in the Chaco region, a global deforestation and defaunation hotspot. Location Argentine Dry Chaco (~490,000 km 2 ). Methods We identified suitable puma habitat patches and movement areas using occupancy modelling and combined it with a spatial human‐puma conflict risk model based on interview data to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ habitat patches. We then used resistance surfaces to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ movement areas, as well as ‘severed’ movement areas where anthropogenic land conversion inhibits movement. Results Safe puma habitat patches (i.e., suitable and safe) covered 29% of the region, whereas attractive sinks (i.e., suitable but risky) represented 12%. Movement areas corresponded to 60% of the region, while conflict risk and high landscape resistance undermined connectivity: unsafe and severed movement areas covered 10% and 11% of the region, respectively. Nearly 98% of safe habitat and movement areas occurred outside protected areas. Main Conclusions We provide an integrated conceptual framework and spatial explicit template for a three‐pronged conservation strategy to (1) protect safe habitat and movement areas, (2) mitigate livestock depredation in attractive sinks and unsafe movement areas and (3) restore landscape in severed and matrix areas to improve ecological connectivity. This would allow pumas to maintain viable populations while reducing negative impacts on local people. More generally, we show how integrating habitat and conflict risk models can reveal opportunities and challenges for human‐carnivore coexistence beyond protected areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diversity and Distributions
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13920
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco

Alfredo Romero‐Muñoz, Matthias Baumann, Tobias Kuemmerle, Arash Ghoddousi et al.
5 citations
Diversity and Distributions
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
2.29
article

Mapping opportunities and barriers for coexistence between people and pumas in the Argentine Dry Chaco

Alfredo Romero‐Muñoz, Matthias Baumann, Tobias Kuemmerle, Arash Ghoddousi, Julieta Decarre, André Luís Regolin, A. Sofía Nanni, Micaela Camino, Felipe Martello, Jamie Burton
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Aim The persistence of large carnivore populations depends on their survival outside protected areas, where they often impact local livelihoods through livestock depredation. Understanding the impacts of human behaviour on large carnivores in shared landscapes is thus important but is often overlooked in habitat assessments or conservation planning. We employed an integrated approach that considers human behaviour and landscape structure metrics to assess the potential for human‐puma ( Puma concolor ) coexistence in the Chaco region, a global deforestation and defaunation hotspot. Location Argentine Dry Chaco (~490,000 km 2 ). Methods We identified suitable puma habitat patches and movement areas using occupancy modelling and combined it with a spatial human‐puma conflict risk model based on interview data to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ habitat patches. We then used resistance surfaces to identify ‘safe’ and ‘unsafe’ movement areas, as well as ‘severed’ movement areas where anthropogenic land conversion inhibits movement. Results Safe puma habitat patches (i.e., suitable and safe) covered 29% of the region, whereas attractive sinks (i.e., suitable but risky) represented 12%. Movement areas corresponded to 60% of the region, while conflict risk and high landscape resistance undermined connectivity: unsafe and severed movement areas covered 10% and 11% of the region, respectively. Nearly 98% of safe habitat and movement areas occurred outside protected areas. Main Conclusions We provide an integrated conceptual framework and spatial explicit template for a three‐pronged conservation strategy to (1) protect safe habitat and movement areas, (2) mitigate livestock depredation in attractive sinks and unsafe movement areas and (3) restore landscape in severed and matrix areas to improve ecological connectivity. This would allow pumas to maintain viable populations while reducing negative impacts on local people. More generally, we show how integrating habitat and conflict risk models can reveal opportunities and challenges for human‐carnivore coexistence beyond protected areas.

Diversity and DistributionsVol. 30(10)
National University of Tucumán (AR), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), University of Oxford (GB), Centro Científico Tecnológico - Nordeste (AR), Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán (AR), National Agricultural Technology Institute (AR), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Conservation Leadership Programme, Rufford Foundation, Wild Felid Research and Management Association, Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
2.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.