Analyzing changes in EU social inclusion using the global Malmquist productivity index

Abstract In this paper, we use the global and the biennial Malmquist productivity indices for the Inverted Benefit‐of‐the‐Doubt model to analyze changes in EU social inclusion using data for the period 2011–2020. Our empirical results indicate that relatively more progress took place in EU social inclusion during the period 2015–2020, compared to the period 2011–2015. In addition, in the period 2011–2015, these improvements were possible mainly through the effect of efficiency change, while in the period 2015–2020, the main source of progress was the effect of the best‐practice change. In addition, we found that the “older” Member States achieved slightly faster progress rates, compared to the “new” Member States in the period 2011–2015, while the opposite was true for the period 2015–2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Transactions in Operational Research
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13519
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing changes in EU social inclusion using the global Malmquist productivity index

Giannis Karagiannis, Panagiotis Ravanos
5 citations
International Transactions in Operational Research
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
5.65
article

Analyzing changes in EU social inclusion using the global Malmquist productivity index

Giannis Karagiannis, Panagiotis Ravanos
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we use the global and the biennial Malmquist productivity indices for the Inverted Benefit‐of‐the‐Doubt model to analyze changes in EU social inclusion using data for the period 2011–2020. Our empirical results indicate that relatively more progress took place in EU social inclusion during the period 2015–2020, compared to the period 2011–2015. In addition, in the period 2011–2015, these improvements were possible mainly through the effect of efficiency change, while in the period 2015–2020, the main source of progress was the effect of the best‐practice change. In addition, we found that the “older” Member States achieved slightly faster progress rates, compared to the “new” Member States in the period 2011–2015, while the opposite was true for the period 2015–2020.

International Transactions in Operational ResearchVol. 32(5)
University of Macedonia (GR), Joint Research Centre (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.