The Influence of 3D Printing Methods and Materials on the Response of Printed Symmetric Carbon Supercapacitors

We compare the electrochemical response and intrinsic limitations of symmetric carbon-based supercapacitors using two 3D-printing techniques, vat polymerization (Vat-P) and fused deposition modelling (FDM). Two cell types were made in this study, one with metallized Vat-P-printed current collectors, the other with PLA (polylactic acid) FDM-printed current collectors in a similarly designed printed coin cell. Carbon-based electrode slurry (various combinations of SWCNT, GNP, Super-P, PVDF) and aqueous 6 M KOH electrolyte were used in these cells. We demonstrate the influence of internal resistance of each 3D-printing method by direct comparison of cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge-discharge tests. The metallized conductive Vat-P cells display better conductivity and more ideal rectangular cyclic voltammetry response but suffer from poor cycle life in initial experiments (∼5,000 charge-discharge cycles before losing all specific capacitance). The FDM current collector cells using graphite-containing PLA materials have poorer conductivity, less ideal cyclic voltammetry curves, and are structurally less robust and partially porous, but offer very stable cycle life for supercapacitor cells retaining most of their specific capacitance after 100,000 charge-discharge cycles. The cycle life of the metallized Vat-P cells are improved by reducing the voltage window to 0.2–0.7 V to limit metal delamination and using Super-P and PVDF additives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ECS Advances
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1149/2754-2734/ad71df
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of 3D Printing Methods and Materials on the Response of Printed Symmetric Carbon Supercapacitors

Matthew Ferguson, Vladimir Egorov, Umair Gulzar, Colm O’Dwyer et al.
2 citations
ECS Advances
Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
0.24
article

The Influence of 3D Printing Methods and Materials on the Response of Printed Symmetric Carbon Supercapacitors

Matthew Ferguson, Vladimir Egorov, Umair Gulzar, Colm O’Dwyer, Yan Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

We compare the electrochemical response and intrinsic limitations of symmetric carbon-based supercapacitors using two 3D-printing techniques, vat polymerization (Vat-P) and fused deposition modelling (FDM). Two cell types were made in this study, one with metallized Vat-P-printed current collectors, the other with PLA (polylactic acid) FDM-printed current collectors in a similarly designed printed coin cell. Carbon-based electrode slurry (various combinations of SWCNT, GNP, Super-P, PVDF) and aqueous 6 M KOH electrolyte were used in these cells. We demonstrate the influence of internal resistance of each 3D-printing method by direct comparison of cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge-discharge tests. The metallized conductive Vat-P cells display better conductivity and more ideal rectangular cyclic voltammetry response but suffer from poor cycle life in initial experiments (∼5,000 charge-discharge cycles before losing all specific capacitance). The FDM current collector cells using graphite-containing PLA materials have poorer conductivity, less ideal cyclic voltammetry curves, and are structurally less robust and partially porous, but offer very stable cycle life for supercapacitor cells retaining most of their specific capacitance after 100,000 charge-discharge cycles. The cycle life of the metallized Vat-P cells are improved by reducing the voltage window to 0.2–0.7 V to limit metal delamination and using Super-P and PVDF additives.

ECS AdvancesVol. 3(3)
National University of Ireland (IE), University College Cork (IE)
Science Foundation Ireland, Irish Research Council, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
0.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.