Third-Best Carbon Taxation: Trading Off Emission Cuts, Equity, and Efficiency

We analyze carbon taxes, lump-sum climate dividends, and changes to the level and progressivity of the income tax system that optimally trade off carbon emissions, equity, and efficient raising of public revenue while preserving budgetary neutrality and not using individualized lump-sum transfers. Such “third-best” policies include a carbon tax that exceeds the Pigouvian level and recycling of all carbon tax revenue via climate dividends for high (and our preferred) degrees of inequality aversion, even if this implies higher income taxes to meet existing revenue requirements. The carbon tax, climate dividends, and the progressivity of the income tax rise with the degree of inequality aversion. Our results are derived from a microsimulation model estimated from German data, which includes heterogeneous households, an exact affine Stone index demand system, and endogenous labor supply. We decompose the welfare effects of policy into emissions, equity, and efficiency components for different degrees of inequality aversion and climate damages.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/732802
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Third-Best Carbon Taxation: Trading Off Emission Cuts, Equity, and Efficiency

Frederick van der Ploeg, Miguel Ángel Aparicio Tovar, Armon Rezai
4 citations
Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
4.52
article

Third-Best Carbon Taxation: Trading Off Emission Cuts, Equity, and Efficiency

Frederick van der Ploeg, Miguel Ángel Aparicio Tovar, Armon Rezai
article en
4 citations

Abstract

We analyze carbon taxes, lump-sum climate dividends, and changes to the level and progressivity of the income tax system that optimally trade off carbon emissions, equity, and efficient raising of public revenue while preserving budgetary neutrality and not using individualized lump-sum transfers. Such “third-best” policies include a carbon tax that exceeds the Pigouvian level and recycling of all carbon tax revenue via climate dividends for high (and our preferred) degrees of inequality aversion, even if this implies higher income taxes to meet existing revenue requirements. The carbon tax, climate dividends, and the progressivity of the income tax rise with the degree of inequality aversion. Our results are derived from a microsimulation model estimated from German data, which includes heterogeneous households, an exact affine Stone index demand system, and endogenous labor supply. We decompose the welfare effects of policy into emissions, equity, and efficiency components for different degrees of inequality aversion and climate damages.

Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource EconomistsVol. 12(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.