Refining penalty parameter selection in whole-body PET image reconstruction for lung cancer patients using the cross-validation log-likelihood method

<i>Objective.</i>Penalty parameters in penalized likelihood positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction are typically determined empirically. The cross-validation log-likelihood (CVLL) method has been introduced to optimize these parameters by maximizing a CVLL function, which assesses the likelihood of reconstructed images using one subset of a list-mode dataset based on another subset. This study aims to validate the efficacy of the CVLL method in whole-body imaging for cancer patients using a conventional clinical PET scanner.<i>Approach.</i>Fifteen lung cancer patients were injected with 243.7 ± 23.8 MBq of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and underwent a 22 min PET scan on a Biograph mCT PET/CT scanner, starting at 60 ± 5 min post-injection. The PET list-mode data were partitioned by subsampling without replacement, with 20 minutes of data for image reconstruction using an in-house ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm and the remaining 2 minutes of data for cross-validation. Two penalty parameters, penalty strength<i>β</i>and Fair penalty function parameter<i>δ</i>, were subjected to optimization. Whole-body images were reconstructed, and CVLL values were computed across various penalty parameter combinations. The optimal image corresponding to the maximum CVLL value was selected by a grid search for each patient.<i>Main results.</i>The<i>δ</i>value required to maximize the CVLL value was notably small (⩽10<sup>-6</sup>in this study). The influences of voxel size and scan duration on image optimization were investigated. A correlation analysis revealed a significant inverse relationship between optimal<i>β</i>and scan count level, with a correlation coefficient of -0.68 (<i>p</i>-value = 3.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). The optimal images selected by the CVLL method were compared with those chosen by two radiologists based on their diagnostic preferences. Differences were observed in the selection of optimal images.<i>Significance.</i>This study demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating the CVLL method into routine imaging protocols, potentially allowing for a wide range of combinations of injected radioactivity amounts and scan durations in modern PET imaging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad7222
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refining penalty parameter selection in whole-body PET image reconstruction for lung cancer patients using the cross-validation log-likelihood method

Jinyi Qi, Lorenzo Nardo, Q. S. Wang, Hande Nalbant et al.
1 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
0.40
article

Refining penalty parameter selection in whole-body PET image reconstruction for lung cancer patients using the cross-validation log-likelihood method

Jinyi Qi, Lorenzo Nardo, Q. S. Wang, Hande Nalbant, Simon R. Cherry, Ramsey Derek Badawi, Yasser G. Abdelhafez, Reimund Bayerlein, Benjamin A. Spencer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Penalty parameters in penalized likelihood positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction are typically determined empirically. The cross-validation log-likelihood (CVLL) method has been introduced to optimize these parameters by maximizing a CVLL function, which assesses the likelihood of reconstructed images using one subset of a list-mode dataset based on another subset. This study aims to validate the efficacy of the CVLL method in whole-body imaging for cancer patients using a conventional clinical PET scanner.<i>Approach.</i>Fifteen lung cancer patients were injected with 243.7 ± 23.8 MBq of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and underwent a 22 min PET scan on a Biograph mCT PET/CT scanner, starting at 60 ± 5 min post-injection. The PET list-mode data were partitioned by subsampling without replacement, with 20 minutes of data for image reconstruction using an in-house ordered subset expectation maximization algorithm and the remaining 2 minutes of data for cross-validation. Two penalty parameters, penalty strength<i>β</i>and Fair penalty function parameter<i>δ</i>, were subjected to optimization. Whole-body images were reconstructed, and CVLL values were computed across various penalty parameter combinations. The optimal image corresponding to the maximum CVLL value was selected by a grid search for each patient.<i>Main results.</i>The<i>δ</i>value required to maximize the CVLL value was notably small (⩽10<sup>-6</sup>in this study). The influences of voxel size and scan duration on image optimization were investigated. A correlation analysis revealed a significant inverse relationship between optimal<i>β</i>and scan count level, with a correlation coefficient of -0.68 (<i>p</i>-value = 3.5 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). The optimal images selected by the CVLL method were compared with those chosen by two radiologists based on their diagnostic preferences. Differences were observed in the selection of optimal images.<i>Significance.</i>This study demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating the CVLL method into routine imaging protocols, potentially allowing for a wide range of combinations of injected radioactivity amounts and scan durations in modern PET imaging.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 69(18)
University of California Davis Medical Center (US), UC Davis Health (US), University of California, Davis (US), Assiut University (EG)
National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.