A Data Perspective on Ethical Challenges in Voice Biometrics Research

Speaker recognition technology, deployed in sectors like banking, education, recruitment, immigration, law enforcement, and healthcare, relies heavily on biometric data. However, the ethical implications and biases inherent in the datasets driving this technology have not been fully explored. Through a longitudinal study of close to 700 papers published at the ISCA Interspeech Conference in the years 2012 to 2021, we investigate how dataset use has evolved alongside the widespread adoption of deep neural networks. Our study identifies the most commonly used datasets in the field and examines their usage patterns. The analysis reveals significant shifts in data practices since the advent of deep learning: a small number of datasets dominate speaker recognition training and evaluation, and the majority of studies evaluate their systems on a single dataset. For four key datasets–Switchboard, Mixer, VoxCeleb, and ASVspoof–we conduct a detailed analysis of metadata and collection methods to assess ethical concerns and privacy risks. Our study highlights numerous challenges related to sampling bias, re-identification, consent, disclosure of sensitive information and security risks in speaker recognition datasets, and emphasizes the need for more representative, fair, and privacy-aware data collection in this domain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity Science
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tbiom.2024.3446846
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Data Perspective on Ethical Challenges in Voice Biometrics Research

Michaela Pnacek, Casandra Rusti, Anna Leschanowsky, Wiebke Toussaint Hutiri et al.
2 citations
IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity Science
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
0.69
article

A Data Perspective on Ethical Challenges in Voice Biometrics Research

Michaela Pnacek, Casandra Rusti, Anna Leschanowsky, Wiebke Toussaint Hutiri, Carolyn Quinlan, Lauriane Gorce
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Speaker recognition technology, deployed in sectors like banking, education, recruitment, immigration, law enforcement, and healthcare, relies heavily on biometric data. However, the ethical implications and biases inherent in the datasets driving this technology have not been fully explored. Through a longitudinal study of close to 700 papers published at the ISCA Interspeech Conference in the years 2012 to 2021, we investigate how dataset use has evolved alongside the widespread adoption of deep neural networks. Our study identifies the most commonly used datasets in the field and examines their usage patterns. The analysis reveals significant shifts in data practices since the advent of deep learning: a small number of datasets dominate speaker recognition training and evaluation, and the majority of studies evaluate their systems on a single dataset. For four key datasets–Switchboard, Mixer, VoxCeleb, and ASVspoof–we conduct a detailed analysis of metadata and collection methods to assess ethical concerns and privacy risks. Our study highlights numerous challenges related to sampling bias, re-identification, consent, disclosure of sensitive information and security risks in speaker recognition datasets, and emphasizes the need for more representative, fair, and privacy-aware data collection in this domain.

IEEE Transactions on Biometrics Behavior and Identity ScienceVol. 7(1)
University of Southern California (US), University of Toronto (CA), York University (CA), Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits (DE), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris (FR), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.