Ethical Alignment Decision Making for Connected Autonomous Vehicle in Traffic Dilemmas via Reinforcement Learning From Human Feedback

Since the introduction of the trolley problem, the ethical decision-making conundrum has evolved from autonomous vehicles (AVs) to connected AVs (CAVs), continuing as a prominent challenge. When confronted with ethical dilemmas, CAVs must align their responses not merely with value-neutral human preferences but also with broader moral and ethical frameworks. Consequently, to ensure that CAVs do not engage in actions that contravene established human moral principles, it is imperative that the ethical considerations are meticulously integrated into their decision-making systems. In this article, we introduce an innovative multiscale multimodal ethical network (M2ENet), which aims to align the AV decision-making system with human ethical feedback in ethical dilemma scenarios. First, we extract morphological and dynamic features from sensory information and signal data, respectively, using multiscale multimodal representation. Additionally, ethical policy-based network is devised to enable AVs to comprehend ethical information, which includes the introduction of an ethical alignment factor to ethically align the feature matrix from human feedback. Furthermore, the accuracy of ethical interaction information is improved through coupled ethical module informed by human feedback. Finally, the efficacy of the system is demonstrated through three representative ethical dilemmas in traffic scenarios, employing both simulation experiments and hardware-in-the-loop testing. The simulation experiments reveal that our proposed model can generate decision-making strategies more aligned with human preferences in ethical traffic scenarios. In addition, in our hardware-in-the-loop tests, it is observed that the average percentage of ethical bias weights decreases by 45.06% after 150 episodes of training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2024.3447070
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Alignment Decision Making for Connected Autonomous Vehicle in Traffic Dilemmas via Reinforcement Learning From Human Feedback

Zirui Li, Xueyuan Li, Tian Luan, Xiaoqiang Meng et al.
5 citations
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.63
article

Ethical Alignment Decision Making for Connected Autonomous Vehicle in Traffic Dilemmas via Reinforcement Learning From Human Feedback

Zirui Li, Xueyuan Li, Tian Luan, Xiaoqiang Meng, Xin Gao, Qi Liu, Zhaoyang Ma
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Since the introduction of the trolley problem, the ethical decision-making conundrum has evolved from autonomous vehicles (AVs) to connected AVs (CAVs), continuing as a prominent challenge. When confronted with ethical dilemmas, CAVs must align their responses not merely with value-neutral human preferences but also with broader moral and ethical frameworks. Consequently, to ensure that CAVs do not engage in actions that contravene established human moral principles, it is imperative that the ethical considerations are meticulously integrated into their decision-making systems. In this article, we introduce an innovative multiscale multimodal ethical network (M2ENet), which aims to align the AV decision-making system with human ethical feedback in ethical dilemma scenarios. First, we extract morphological and dynamic features from sensory information and signal data, respectively, using multiscale multimodal representation. Additionally, ethical policy-based network is devised to enable AVs to comprehend ethical information, which includes the introduction of an ethical alignment factor to ethically align the feature matrix from human feedback. Furthermore, the accuracy of ethical interaction information is improved through coupled ethical module informed by human feedback. Finally, the efficacy of the system is demonstrated through three representative ethical dilemmas in traffic scenarios, employing both simulation experiments and hardware-in-the-loop testing. The simulation experiments reveal that our proposed model can generate decision-making strategies more aligned with human preferences in ethical traffic scenarios. In addition, in our hardware-in-the-loop tests, it is observed that the average percentage of ethical bias weights decreases by 45.06% after 150 episodes of training.

IEEE Internet of Things JournalVol. 11(23)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Beijing Jiaotong University (CN), First Automotive Works (China) (CN)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.