Contrasting dynamics of past climate states and critical transitions via dimensional analysis

While past major climate transitions can be unequivocally identified, understanding of underlying mechanisms and timescales remains limited. We employ a dimensional analysis of benthic stable isotope records across different timescales to uncover how Cenozoic climatic fluctuations are associated with changes in the number of feedbacks and mechanisms involved. Our analysis indicates that warmer and colder climates respond substantially differently to orbital forcing. Notably, large numbers of feedbacks dominated during the Icehouse (3.3 Ma to present) state at obliquity and eccentricity timescales, and during the Warmhouse (66-56 Ma and 47-34 Ma) and Hothouse (56-47 Ma) states at precession timescales. During the Coolhouse (34-3.3 Ma) state the number of active feedbacks was low and had no dominant timescale. Coupling between climate signals that affect oxygen and carbon isotope records appears high only in the Icehouse state, and low to absent in all other states. We also find that anomalously high active feedback numbers and very high coupling occurred across all timescales during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM, 56 Ma), which suggests a complete system perturbation. In conclusion, our findings challenge the notion of a simple and unique conceptual model of interconnected feedbacks in reproducing Cenozoic paleoclimate variability, given that different numbers of active feedbacks with different levels of coupling governed different timescales between climate states, which then affected the inherent (in-)stability of each climate state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96432-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrasting dynamics of past climate states and critical transitions via dimensional analysis

Fabio Florindo, Tommaso Alberti, Valerio Lucarini, Eelco J. Rohling et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
1.11
article

Contrasting dynamics of past climate states and critical transitions via dimensional analysis

Fabio Florindo, Tommaso Alberti, Valerio Lucarini, Eelco J. Rohling, Davide Faranda
article en
1 citations

Abstract

While past major climate transitions can be unequivocally identified, understanding of underlying mechanisms and timescales remains limited. We employ a dimensional analysis of benthic stable isotope records across different timescales to uncover how Cenozoic climatic fluctuations are associated with changes in the number of feedbacks and mechanisms involved. Our analysis indicates that warmer and colder climates respond substantially differently to orbital forcing. Notably, large numbers of feedbacks dominated during the Icehouse (3.3 Ma to present) state at obliquity and eccentricity timescales, and during the Warmhouse (66-56 Ma and 47-34 Ma) and Hothouse (56-47 Ma) states at precession timescales. During the Coolhouse (34-3.3 Ma) state the number of active feedbacks was low and had no dominant timescale. Coupling between climate signals that affect oxygen and carbon isotope records appears high only in the Icehouse state, and low to absent in all other states. We also find that anomalously high active feedback numbers and very high coupling occurred across all timescales during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM, 56 Ma), which suggests a complete system perturbation. In conclusion, our findings challenge the notion of a simple and unique conceptual model of interconnected feedbacks in reproducing Cenozoic paleoclimate variability, given that different numbers of active feedbacks with different levels of coupling governed different timescales between climate states, which then affected the inherent (in-)stability of each climate state.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Leicester (GB), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (FR), Istituto di Scienze Marine del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IT), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), London Mathematical Laboratory (GB), University of Southampton (GB), University of Reading (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.