Introduction: The rise of formal institutions in the Asia-Pacific region through competitive regime complexity

Abstract The emergence of formal regional regimes characterized by precision and non-delegation signifies a major shift in the Asia-Pacific region. This special issue addresses the previously unexamined politics of institutional change towards formalization by analysing the policy realms of emergency liquidity provision, development aid, clean air, and labour immigration. To guide our research, this introductory article presents a conceptual framework that posits a novel argument: formalization is a result of competitive regime creation and flexible regime choice, fostering mutually beneficial regimes within a system of state sovereignty, and dispersed state capabilities lacking centralized coordinating authority. In such a context, multiple major states initiate regimes to secure order-setting privileges. Given the existence of multiple regimes, smaller states never commit themselves to a single regime; instead, they engage in forum shopping to select the regimes that best advance their preferences. Without third-party enforcement, these regimes are implementable only if they remain aligned with the evolving state preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
Published
2024-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcae012
Citations
2
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Introduction: The rise of formal institutions in the Asia-Pacific region through competitive regime complexity

Motoshi Suzuki
2 citations
International Relations of the Asia-Pacific
International Development and Aid
2.80
article

Introduction: The rise of formal institutions in the Asia-Pacific region through competitive regime complexity

Motoshi Suzuki
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The emergence of formal regional regimes characterized by precision and non-delegation signifies a major shift in the Asia-Pacific region. This special issue addresses the previously unexamined politics of institutional change towards formalization by analysing the policy realms of emergency liquidity provision, development aid, clean air, and labour immigration. To guide our research, this introductory article presents a conceptual framework that posits a novel argument: formalization is a result of competitive regime creation and flexible regime choice, fostering mutually beneficial regimes within a system of state sovereignty, and dispersed state capabilities lacking centralized coordinating authority. In such a context, multiple major states initiate regimes to secure order-setting privileges. Given the existence of multiple regimes, smaller states never commit themselves to a single regime; instead, they engage in forum shopping to select the regimes that best advance their preferences. Without third-party enforcement, these regimes are implementable only if they remain aligned with the evolving state preferences.

International Relations of the Asia-PacificVol. 24(3)
Kyoto University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
International Development and Aid
2.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Introduction: The rise of formal institutions in the Asia-Pacific region through competitive regime complexity — Motoshi Suzuki · International Relations of the Asia-Pacific (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS