The conundrum of costs allocation in international investment arbitrations: a proposed practical solution to enhance predictability of costs decisions

Abstract This paper analyses how international investment tribunals constituted under the ICSID and UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules addressed the matter of costs allocation. After a review and classification of some of the most relevant decisions of the last decades on the topic, the paper concludes that costs decision in investment arbitration are extremely erratic and unpredictable still today, with negative consequences for the parties’ interests that should not be underestimated. For this reason, the paper puts forward a new practical approach which might be adopted by arbitral tribunals in investment cases, and that—while ensuring full compliance with the applicable arbitration rules—would enhance predictability and lead to more rational and ‘just’ costs decisions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Arbitration International
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiae025
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The conundrum of costs allocation in international investment arbitrations: a proposed practical solution to enhance predictability of costs decisions

Nicolò Minella
Arbitration International
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

The conundrum of costs allocation in international investment arbitrations: a proposed practical solution to enhance predictability of costs decisions

Nicolò Minella
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyses how international investment tribunals constituted under the ICSID and UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules addressed the matter of costs allocation. After a review and classification of some of the most relevant decisions of the last decades on the topic, the paper concludes that costs decision in investment arbitration are extremely erratic and unpredictable still today, with negative consequences for the parties’ interests that should not be underestimated. For this reason, the paper puts forward a new practical approach which might be adopted by arbitral tribunals in investment cases, and that—while ensuring full compliance with the applicable arbitration rules—would enhance predictability and lead to more rational and ‘just’ costs decisions.

Arbitration InternationalVol. 40(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.