The emotional labour of peer work: encountering stigma in mental healthcare spaces

This article focuses on the workplace experiences of peer workers with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in mental healthcare settings in Australia. Our article is located at the intersection of political, social, cultural, and legislative forces that have fostered the development of peer work as a paid profession. We draw on the concept of stigma to analyse findings from qualitative interviews with peer workers conducted in [state], Australia. By examining peer work in the broader context of lifeworlds of BPD, we address the interplay of work and professional identity, and the experience of a profoundly stigmatised diagnosis at this intersection.Our findings demonstrate the physical and emotional effects of stigma and how it produces boundaries and inequalities between peer workers and other health practitioners. These boundaries are reinforced by invisible markers that delineate what is expected, 'normal' and deemed professional in the workplace. Moreover, these same medico-socio-political relations help shape peer workers' identities and experiences. The development of peer workforces in mental healthcare service delivery is a prominent area of reform in Australia and internationally. Our research highlights the urgency of efforts to transform current socio-cultural-political relations that inhibit peer workers in their roles and impact workplace experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Sociology Review
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2024.2391437
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The emotional labour of peer work: encountering stigma in mental healthcare spaces

Tamara Borovica, Andrew M. Chanen, Sathya Rao, Emma Seal et al.
8 citations
Health Sociology Review
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
6.79
article

The emotional labour of peer work: encountering stigma in mental healthcare spaces

Tamara Borovica, Andrew M. Chanen, Sathya Rao, Emma Seal, Renata Kokanović, Stuart Thomas, Cameron Duff, Jacinthe Flore
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This article focuses on the workplace experiences of peer workers with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in mental healthcare settings in Australia. Our article is located at the intersection of political, social, cultural, and legislative forces that have fostered the development of peer work as a paid profession. We draw on the concept of stigma to analyse findings from qualitative interviews with peer workers conducted in [state], Australia. By examining peer work in the broader context of lifeworlds of BPD, we address the interplay of work and professional identity, and the experience of a profoundly stigmatised diagnosis at this intersection.Our findings demonstrate the physical and emotional effects of stigma and how it produces boundaries and inequalities between peer workers and other health practitioners. These boundaries are reinforced by invisible markers that delineate what is expected, 'normal' and deemed professional in the workplace. Moreover, these same medico-socio-political relations help shape peer workers' identities and experiences. The development of peer workforces in mental healthcare service delivery is a prominent area of reform in Australia and internationally. Our research highlights the urgency of efforts to transform current socio-cultural-political relations that inhibit peer workers in their roles and impact workplace experiences.

Health Sociology ReviewVol. 34(2)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), MIT University (MK), Orygen (AU), Pro Persona (NL), Monash University (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
6.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.