In-House Virtual Planning and 3D-Printed Surgical Guides for Reconstructive Rhinoplasty
Abstract Background Performing rhinoplasty in patients with craniofacial malformations remains a challenge, even for experienced surgeons. Advances in 3-dimensional technology and their application in surgical planning and printing of cutting guides and splints have become important tools for improving aesthetic and functional results. Objectives The aim of this preliminary report was to describe an in-house workflow for surgical planning and printing of cutting guides and splints for complex rhinoplasty cases. Methods An in-house workflow for complex rhinoplasty was described, as applied in the maxillofacial department of a children's hospital specializing in the treatment of cleft and craniofacial malformations. Results Customized surgical guides helped the surgeon harvest and mold potential septal and costochondral grafts more accurately, reduced surgical time, and verified the dimensions of the sculpted nasal shape following surgical planning templates. Patient satisfaction according to the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire was 18/24. Conclusions The presented workflow represents a potential asset for obtaining more accurate and satisfactory results in complex rhinoplasties. Level of Evidence: 5 (Diagnostic)
Authors
- Joana Gonçalves (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7595-5328)
- Adaia Valls-Ontañón (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4065-7405)
- Arnau Valls-Esteve (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1151-3042)
- Wenceslao Calonge
- Nuria Segarra Adell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9667-2420)
- Josep Rubio-Palau (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2642-930X)
- Albert Malet-Contreras (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5616-2485)
- Trini Arenas-Costa
Institutions
- Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Aesthetic Surgery Journal
- Published
- 2024-08-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae179
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.29