Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study

We found significant differences in psychosocial work environment factors among work sectors and job positions at baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, three psychosocial work environment factors decreased at follow-up. Possible explanations are the utilization of specific psychosocial factors as resources to cope with psychosocial stressors, high participant expectations that were not met by the intervention, insufficient time for structural changes, or the intervention prompting critical evaluations of the work environment. These findings will inform the design and implementation of the forthcoming clustered randomized controlled trial, where they will also be further investigated to validate their significance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study

Hans De Witte, Paul E. Corcoran, Kahar Abdulla, Chantal Van Audenhove et al.
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study

Hans De Witte, Paul E. Corcoran, Kahar Abdulla, Chantal Van Audenhove, Birgit Aust, Margaret Maxwell, Fotini Tsantila, Eve Griffin, Arlinda Cerga Pashoja, Lars de Winter, Evelien Coppens, Caleb Leduc, Reiner Rugulies, Birgit A. Greiner, Hanna Reich, Ella Arensman, Bridget Hogg, Mallorie Leduc, Victoria Ross
article en

Abstract

We found significant differences in psychosocial work environment factors among work sectors and job positions at baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, three psychosocial work environment factors decreased at follow-up. Possible explanations are the utilization of specific psychosocial factors as resources to cope with psychosocial stressors, high participant expectations that were not met by the intervention, insufficient time for structural changes, or the intervention prompting critical evaluations of the work environment. These findings will inform the design and implementation of the forthcoming clustered randomized controlled trial, where they will also be further investigated to validate their significance.

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental HealthVol. 97(8)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Griffith University (AU), University of Stirling (GB), University of Copenhagen (DK), Vaal University of Technology (ZA), University College Cork (IE), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES), Hospital Del Mar (ES), National Research Centre for the Working Environment (DK), National Suicide Research Foundation (IE), European Alliance Against Depression (DE), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.