Interventional human ocular safety experiments for 222‐nm far‐ultraviolet‐C lamp irradiation

The study aimed to directly assess the ocular safety of 222-nm far-ultraviolet-C (UVC) irradiation in humans, given the limited clinical trials in this area. This wavelength offers the potential for safe and effective microbial inactivation in occupied spaces, but its safety profile for human eyes requires thorough investigation. This prospective, interventional study involved five subjects aged 29-47 years, who were exposed to 222-nm UVC at doses of 22, 50, and 75 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>. The subjects were monitored using custom-made glasses with a UV-cut filter on one eye to serve as a control. UVC irradiation was conducted using a KrCl excimer lamp, and ocular examinations were performed prior to exposure, 24 h post-exposure, and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Parameters assessed included visual acuity, refractive error, corneal endothelial density, corneal erosion scores, and conjunctival hyperemia scores. The study found no clinically significant photokeratitis or long-term eye damage across the five subjects, even at the highest dose of 75 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>. Temporary ocular discomfort, including sensations of dryness and epiphora, was reported, but these symptoms subsided within hours after irradiation. The findings indicate that 222-nm far-UVC irradiation up to 75 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> does not cause "clinically significant photokeratitis" or long-term ocular damage, though it may induce temporary discomfort. This supports the safe use of 222-nm UVC for germicidal applications in occupied environments, providing a basis for revised safety guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/php.14016
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Skin Protection and Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interventional human ocular safety experiments for 222‐nm far‐ultraviolet‐C lamp irradiation

Sachiko Kaidzu, Masaki Tanito, Kazunobu Sugihara, Masahiro Sasaki
11 citations
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Skin Protection and Aging
5.88
article

Interventional human ocular safety experiments for 222‐nm far‐ultraviolet‐C lamp irradiation

Sachiko Kaidzu, Masaki Tanito, Kazunobu Sugihara, Masahiro Sasaki
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The study aimed to directly assess the ocular safety of 222-nm far-ultraviolet-C (UVC) irradiation in humans, given the limited clinical trials in this area. This wavelength offers the potential for safe and effective microbial inactivation in occupied spaces, but its safety profile for human eyes requires thorough investigation. This prospective, interventional study involved five subjects aged 29-47 years, who were exposed to 222-nm UVC at doses of 22, 50, and 75 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>. The subjects were monitored using custom-made glasses with a UV-cut filter on one eye to serve as a control. UVC irradiation was conducted using a KrCl excimer lamp, and ocular examinations were performed prior to exposure, 24 h post-exposure, and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Parameters assessed included visual acuity, refractive error, corneal endothelial density, corneal erosion scores, and conjunctival hyperemia scores. The study found no clinically significant photokeratitis or long-term eye damage across the five subjects, even at the highest dose of 75 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup>. Temporary ocular discomfort, including sensations of dryness and epiphora, was reported, but these symptoms subsided within hours after irradiation. The findings indicate that 222-nm far-UVC irradiation up to 75 mJ/cm<sup>2</sup> does not cause "clinically significant photokeratitis" or long-term ocular damage, though it may induce temporary discomfort. This supports the safe use of 222-nm UVC for germicidal applications in occupied environments, providing a basis for revised safety guidelines.

Photochemistry and PhotobiologyVol. 101(2)
Shimane University (JP), Ushio (Japan) (JP)
Shimane University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Skin Protection and Aging
5.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.