Comparative analysis of dental implant placement accuracy: Semi‐active robotic versus free‐hand techniques: A randomized controlled clinical trial

The results indicated that the RAIS method demonstrated superior accuracy in single dental implant placement compared with the FHIS method. Specifically, RAIS exhibited significantly smaller deviations in platform, apex, and angular positions, as well as platform and apex vertical/horizontal deviations. This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=195045.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13375
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of dental implant placement accuracy: Semi‐active robotic versus free‐hand techniques: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Zhenshi Wang, Linhong Wang, Ruijue Cao, Yude Ding et al.
22 citations
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
10.86
article

Comparative analysis of dental implant placement accuracy: Semi‐active robotic versus free‐hand techniques: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Zhenshi Wang, Linhong Wang, Ruijue Cao, Yude Ding, Qingwei Tang, Yuchen Zheng, Beilei Liu, Jianping Chen, Fan Yang, Min Huang, Haiyan Liu
article en
22 citations

Abstract

The results indicated that the RAIS method demonstrated superior accuracy in single dental implant placement compared with the FHIS method. Specifically, RAIS exhibited significantly smaller deviations in platform, apex, and angular positions, as well as platform and apex vertical/horizontal deviations. This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=195045.

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchVol. 26(6)
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Nanchang University (CN), Hangzhou Normal University (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi Medical College (CN), Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (CN), Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Major Scientific and Technological Project of Zhejiang Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
10.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative analysis of dental implant placement accuracy: Semi‐active robotic versus free‐hand techniques: A randomized controlled clinical trial — Zhenshi Wang, Linhong Wang, et al. · Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS