Cost–benefit analysis of the National Immunization Program in Spain

Broad benefits of vaccination programs are well acknowledged but difficult to measure, especially when considering all vaccines included in a National Immunization Program (NIP). The aim was to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the entire NIP in Spain, and an expanded NIP including four potential additional programs. A cost-benefit analysis was performed in Excel to assess the economic and health benefits (€) of vaccinating a single cohort of newborns over a lifetime horizon compared to no vaccination, from a societal perspective: firstly, according to the 2020 NIP in Spain (including 2021 recommendation for herpes zoster in 65-year-olds); and secondly, with an expanded NIP (adding rotavirus and meningococcal B in infants, and pertussis booster in adults aged >65 years and herpes zoster in all adults >50 years). The main inputs were taken from published literature and Spanish databases. Results were presented as a benefit-cost ratio (economic benefit per €1 invested). A cohort of 343,126 newborns were included in the analysis. The total investment needed to vaccinate the cohort throughout their lifetime, according to the 2020 NIP and the expanded NIP, was estimated at €168.5 million and €275.5 million, respectively. Potential economic benefits were €772.2 million and €803.0 million, respectively. The societal benefit-cost ratio was €4.58 and €2.91 per €1 invested, respectively. Even with the addition of new vaccination programs, the Spanish NIP yielded positive benefit-cost ratios from the societal perspective, demonstrating that NIPs spanning the full life course are an efficient public health measure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2024.2385175
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost–benefit analysis of the National Immunization Program in Spain

Antonio Ruíz, Almudena González, Mathilde Daheron, Laura Amanda Vallejo-Aparicio et al.
3 citations
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
1.58
article

Cost–benefit analysis of the National Immunization Program in Spain

Antonio Ruíz, Almudena González, Mathilde Daheron, Laura Amanda Vallejo-Aparicio, Néboa Zozaya, María Fernández Prada, Irene Fernández, N. Vidal Cassinello, Ekkehard Beck, Alberto I. Vargas, Andrea García, Álvaro Hidalgo, Ana Durán
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Broad benefits of vaccination programs are well acknowledged but difficult to measure, especially when considering all vaccines included in a National Immunization Program (NIP). The aim was to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the entire NIP in Spain, and an expanded NIP including four potential additional programs. A cost-benefit analysis was performed in Excel to assess the economic and health benefits (€) of vaccinating a single cohort of newborns over a lifetime horizon compared to no vaccination, from a societal perspective: firstly, according to the 2020 NIP in Spain (including 2021 recommendation for herpes zoster in 65-year-olds); and secondly, with an expanded NIP (adding rotavirus and meningococcal B in infants, and pertussis booster in adults aged >65 years and herpes zoster in all adults >50 years). The main inputs were taken from published literature and Spanish databases. Results were presented as a benefit-cost ratio (economic benefit per €1 invested). A cohort of 343,126 newborns were included in the analysis. The total investment needed to vaccinate the cohort throughout their lifetime, according to the 2020 NIP and the expanded NIP, was estimated at €168.5 million and €275.5 million, respectively. Potential economic benefits were €772.2 million and €803.0 million, respectively. The societal benefit-cost ratio was €4.58 and €2.91 per €1 invested, respectively. Even with the addition of new vaccination programs, the Spanish NIP yielded positive benefit-cost ratios from the societal perspective, demonstrating that NIPs spanning the full life course are an efficient public health measure.

Human Vaccines & ImmunotherapeuticsVol. 20(1)
Canarie (CA), Max Weber Stiftung - Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland (DE), Complejo Asistencial Sótero del Río (CL), Andalusian Centre for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology (ES), GlaxoSmithKline (Spain) (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (ES), Weber (ES), Fundación Renal Española (ES), University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES), Universidad Pontificia Comillas (ES)
GlaxoSmithKline
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.