Knowledge-Augmented Deep Learning for Segmenting and Detecting Cerebral Aneurysms With CT Angiography: A Multicenter Study

Background Deep learning (DL) could improve the labor-intensive, challenging processes of diagnosing cerebral aneurysms but requires large multicenter data sets. Purpose To construct a DL model using a multicenter data set for accurate cerebral aneurysm segmentation and detection on CT angiography (CTA) images and to compare its performance with radiology reports. Materials and Methods Consecutive head or head and neck CTA images of suspected unruptured cerebral aneurysms were gathered retrospectively from eight hospitals between February 2018 and October 2021 for model development. An external test set with reference standard digital subtraction angiography (DSA) scans was obtained retrospectively from one of the eight hospitals between February 2022 and February 2023. Radiologists (reference standard) assessed aneurysm segmentation, while model performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The model's aneurysm detection performance was assessed by sensitivity and comparing areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) between the model and radiology reports in the DSA data set with use of the DeLong test. Results Images from 6060 patients (mean age, 56 years ± 12 [SD]; 3375 [55.7%] female) were included for model development (training: 4342; validation: 1086; and internal test set: 632). Another 118 patients (mean age, 59 years ± 14; 79 [66.9%] female) were included in an external test set to evaluate performance based on DSA. The model achieved a DSC of 0.87 for aneurysm segmentation performance in the internal test set. Using DSA, the model achieved 85.7% (108 of 126 aneurysms [95% CI: 78.1, 90.1]) sensitivity in detecting aneurysms on per-vessel analysis, with no evidence of a difference versus radiology reports (AUC, 0.93 [95% CI: 0.90, 0.95] vs 0.91 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]; <i>P</i> = .67). Model processing time from reconstruction to detection was 1.76 minutes ± 0.32 per scan. Conclusion The proposed DL model could accurately segment and detect cerebral aneurysms at CTA with no evidence of a significant difference in diagnostic performance compared with radiology reports. © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Payabvash in this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233197
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge-Augmented Deep Learning for Segmenting and Detecting Cerebral Aneurysms With CT Angiography: A Multicenter Study

Jie Lu, Xueqian Xie, Fajin Lv, Chunhong Hu et al.
18 citations
Radiology
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
6.64
article

Knowledge-Augmented Deep Learning for Segmenting and Detecting Cerebral Aneurysms With CT Angiography: A Multicenter Study

Jie Lu, Xueqian Xie, Fajin Lv, Chunhong Hu, Zhenghan Yang, Chune Ma, Zhiwen Yang, X Z Song, Lisong Dai, Xiaoer Wei, Yonggao Zhang, Yueqi Zhu, Zheng Sun, Yuehua Li, Jianyong Wei, Mengfei Wang, Yidong Jin
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Background Deep learning (DL) could improve the labor-intensive, challenging processes of diagnosing cerebral aneurysms but requires large multicenter data sets. Purpose To construct a DL model using a multicenter data set for accurate cerebral aneurysm segmentation and detection on CT angiography (CTA) images and to compare its performance with radiology reports. Materials and Methods Consecutive head or head and neck CTA images of suspected unruptured cerebral aneurysms were gathered retrospectively from eight hospitals between February 2018 and October 2021 for model development. An external test set with reference standard digital subtraction angiography (DSA) scans was obtained retrospectively from one of the eight hospitals between February 2022 and February 2023. Radiologists (reference standard) assessed aneurysm segmentation, while model performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The model's aneurysm detection performance was assessed by sensitivity and comparing areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) between the model and radiology reports in the DSA data set with use of the DeLong test. Results Images from 6060 patients (mean age, 56 years ± 12 [SD]; 3375 [55.7%] female) were included for model development (training: 4342; validation: 1086; and internal test set: 632). Another 118 patients (mean age, 59 years ± 14; 79 [66.9%] female) were included in an external test set to evaluate performance based on DSA. The model achieved a DSC of 0.87 for aneurysm segmentation performance in the internal test set. Using DSA, the model achieved 85.7% (108 of 126 aneurysms [95% CI: 78.1, 90.1]) sensitivity in detecting aneurysms on per-vessel analysis, with no evidence of a difference versus radiology reports (AUC, 0.93 [95% CI: 0.90, 0.95] vs 0.91 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.94]; <i>P</i> = .67). Model processing time from reconstruction to detection was 1.76 minutes ± 0.32 per scan. Conclusion The proposed DL model could accurately segment and detect cerebral aneurysms at CTA with no evidence of a significant difference in diagnostic performance compared with radiology reports. © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Payabvash in this issue.

RadiologyVol. 312(2)
Soochow University (CN), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Shen Kang Hospital Development Center, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
6.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.