Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne and CLSI M38-Ed3 reference method for determining echinocandin minimum effective concentrations against <i>Aspergillus</i> isolates

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of echinocandins against <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. does not represent the actual inhibition threshold of echinocandins. Therefore, the recommended method to evaluate their activity is determining the minimum effective concentration (MEC) in broth microdilution, a method that is less common in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess a user-friendly commercial method, Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), to determine the effectiveness of echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin) against <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. Echinocandins MEC was determined against 23 isolates of <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. using SYO and the reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method. MECs were read with an inverted microscope and a reading mirror. Essential agreement (EA) between the tested methods was defined as a ±twofold dilution difference. There was a high EA (91%-100%) between the reference method and SYO in determining echinocandins MEC against <i>Aspergillus</i> isolates using inverted microscopy. A high EA was also observed between SYO MEC determined by inverted microscopy and a reading mirror, but different incubation times were required. SYO is a reliable, simple method for determining the MEC of echinocandins against <i>Aspergillus</i> isolates, preferably with an inverted microscope, and can be easily used in clinical laboratories when echinocandin susceptibility testing is required.IMPORTANCEUsing a commercial method such as Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of echinocandins against <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. has been shown to be a reliable alternative to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference method. This makes it more suitable for high-volume clinical laboratories. SYO provides accurate results comparable to the standard method and could potentially improve patient care by guiding more optimal antifungal treatment choices for patients with <i>Aspergillus</i> infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microbiology Spectrum
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00280-24
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne and CLSI M38-Ed3 reference method for determining echinocandin minimum effective concentrations against Aspergillus isolates

Matan Joel Cohen, Alexander Rouvinski, Hila Elinav, Maya Korem et al.
2 citations
Microbiology Spectrum
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
0.78
article

Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne and CLSI M38-Ed3 reference method for determining echinocandin minimum effective concentrations against Aspergillus isolates

Matan Joel Cohen, Alexander Rouvinski, Hila Elinav, Maya Korem, Itzhack Polacheck, Assaf Potruch
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of echinocandins against <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. does not represent the actual inhibition threshold of echinocandins. Therefore, the recommended method to evaluate their activity is determining the minimum effective concentration (MEC) in broth microdilution, a method that is less common in clinical settings. This study aimed to assess a user-friendly commercial method, Sensititre YeastOne (SYO), to determine the effectiveness of echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin) against <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. Echinocandins MEC was determined against 23 isolates of <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. using SYO and the reference Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) method. MECs were read with an inverted microscope and a reading mirror. Essential agreement (EA) between the tested methods was defined as a ±twofold dilution difference. There was a high EA (91%-100%) between the reference method and SYO in determining echinocandins MEC against <i>Aspergillus</i> isolates using inverted microscopy. A high EA was also observed between SYO MEC determined by inverted microscopy and a reading mirror, but different incubation times were required. SYO is a reliable, simple method for determining the MEC of echinocandins against <i>Aspergillus</i> isolates, preferably with an inverted microscope, and can be easily used in clinical laboratories when echinocandin susceptibility testing is required.IMPORTANCEUsing a commercial method such as Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) to determine the minimum effective concentration (MEC) of echinocandins against <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. has been shown to be a reliable alternative to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference method. This makes it more suitable for high-volume clinical laboratories. SYO provides accurate results comparable to the standard method and could potentially improve patient care by guiding more optimal antifungal treatment choices for patients with <i>Aspergillus</i> infections.

Microbiology SpectrumVol. 12(10)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Hadassah Medical Center (IL), Clalit Health Services (IL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.