Net primary productivity and litter decomposition rates in two distinct Amazonian peatlands

Measurements of net primary productivity (NPP) and litter decomposition from tropical peatlands are severely lacking, limiting our ability to parameterise and validate models of tropical peatland development and thereby make robust predictions of how these systems will respond to future environmental and climatic change. Here, we present total NPP (i.e., above- and below-ground) and decomposition data from two floristically and structurally distinct forested peatland sites within the Pastaza Marañón Foreland Basin, northern Peru, the largest tropical peatland area in Amazonia: (1) a palm (largely Mauritia flexuosa) dominated swamp forest and (2) a hardwood dominated swamp forest (known as 'pole forest', due to the abundance of thin-stemmed trees). Total NPP in the palm forest and hardwood-dominated forest (9.83 ± 1.43 and 7.34 ± 0.84 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>, respectively) was low compared with values reported for terra firme forest in the region (14.21-15.01 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>) and for tropical peatlands elsewhere (11.06 and 13.20 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>). Despite the similar total NPP of the two forest types, there were considerable differences in the distribution of NPP. Fine root NPP was seven times higher in the palm forest (4.56 ± 1.05 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>) than in the hardwood forest (0.61 ± 0.22 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>). Above-ground palm NPP, a frequently overlooked component, made large contributions to total NPP in the palm-dominated forest, accounting for 41% (14% in the hardwood-dominated forest). Conversely, Mauritia flexuosa litter decomposition rates were the same in both plots: highest for leaf material, followed by root and then stem material (21%, 77% and 86% of mass remaining after 1 year respectively for both plots). Our results suggest potential differences in these two peatland types' responses to climate and other environmental changes and will assist in future modelling studies of these systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Change Biology
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17436
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Net primary productivity and litter decomposition rates in two distinct Amazonian peatlands

Jimmy Cesar Cordova Oroche, Julio Irarica Pacaya, Greta C. Dargie, Edward T. A. Mitchard et al.
6 citations
Global Change Biology
Forest ecology and management
4.15
article

Net primary productivity and litter decomposition rates in two distinct Amazonian peatlands

Jimmy Cesar Cordova Oroche, Julio Irarica Pacaya, Greta C. Dargie, Edward T. A. Mitchard, Adam Hastie, Jhon del Águila Pasquel, Mathew Williams, Simon L. Lewis, Frederick C. Draper, Eurídice N. Honorio Coronado, Ian T. Lawson, Katherine H. Roucoux, Timothy R. Baker
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Measurements of net primary productivity (NPP) and litter decomposition from tropical peatlands are severely lacking, limiting our ability to parameterise and validate models of tropical peatland development and thereby make robust predictions of how these systems will respond to future environmental and climatic change. Here, we present total NPP (i.e., above- and below-ground) and decomposition data from two floristically and structurally distinct forested peatland sites within the Pastaza Marañón Foreland Basin, northern Peru, the largest tropical peatland area in Amazonia: (1) a palm (largely Mauritia flexuosa) dominated swamp forest and (2) a hardwood dominated swamp forest (known as 'pole forest', due to the abundance of thin-stemmed trees). Total NPP in the palm forest and hardwood-dominated forest (9.83 ± 1.43 and 7.34 ± 0.84 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>, respectively) was low compared with values reported for terra firme forest in the region (14.21-15.01 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>) and for tropical peatlands elsewhere (11.06 and 13.20 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>). Despite the similar total NPP of the two forest types, there were considerable differences in the distribution of NPP. Fine root NPP was seven times higher in the palm forest (4.56 ± 1.05 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>) than in the hardwood forest (0.61 ± 0.22 Mg C ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>). Above-ground palm NPP, a frequently overlooked component, made large contributions to total NPP in the palm-dominated forest, accounting for 41% (14% in the hardwood-dominated forest). Conversely, Mauritia flexuosa litter decomposition rates were the same in both plots: highest for leaf material, followed by root and then stem material (21%, 77% and 86% of mass remaining after 1 year respectively for both plots). Our results suggest potential differences in these two peatland types' responses to climate and other environmental changes and will assist in future modelling studies of these systems.

Global Change BiologyVol. 30(8)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), University of St Andrews (GB), Charles University (CZ), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB), Department of Space (IN), Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana (PE), Global Security Intelligence (United Kingdom) (GB), University College London (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Sight Research UK, Natural Environment Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Forest ecology and management
4.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.