Assessing self‐reported prolonged grief disorder with “clinical checks”: A proof of principle study

Psychological assessment is commonly conducted using either self-report measures or clinical interviews; the former are quick and easy to administer, and the latter are more time-consuming and require training. Self-report measures have been criticized for producing higher estimates of symptom and disorder presence relative to clinical interviews, with the assumption being that self-report measures are prone to Type 1 error. Here, we introduce the use of "clinical checks" within an existing self-report measure. These are brief supplementary questions intended to clarify and confirm initial responses, similar to what occurs in a clinical interview. Clinical checks were developed for the items of the International Grief Questionnaire (IGQ), a self-report measure of ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder (PGD). Data were collected as part of a community survey of mental health in Ukraine. Individual symptom endorsements for the IGQ significantly decreased with the use of clinical checks, and the percentage of the sample that met the ICD-11 diagnostic requirements for PGD fell from 13.6% to 10.2%, representing a 24.8% reduction in cases. The value and potential broader application of clinical checks are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23100
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing self‐reported prolonged grief disorder with “clinical checks”: A proof of principle study

Mark Shevlin, Menachem Ben‐Ezra, Kristina Bondjers, Marylène Cloître et al.
2 citations
Journal of Traumatic Stress
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
1.28
article

Assessing self‐reported prolonged grief disorder with “clinical checks”: A proof of principle study

Mark Shevlin, Menachem Ben‐Ezra, Kristina Bondjers, Marylène Cloître, Thanos Karatzias, Philip Hyland, Enya Redican, Michael Duffy, Chris R. Brewin, Dmytro Martsenkovskyi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Psychological assessment is commonly conducted using either self-report measures or clinical interviews; the former are quick and easy to administer, and the latter are more time-consuming and require training. Self-report measures have been criticized for producing higher estimates of symptom and disorder presence relative to clinical interviews, with the assumption being that self-report measures are prone to Type 1 error. Here, we introduce the use of "clinical checks" within an existing self-report measure. These are brief supplementary questions intended to clarify and confirm initial responses, similar to what occurs in a clinical interview. Clinical checks were developed for the items of the International Grief Questionnaire (IGQ), a self-report measure of ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder (PGD). Data were collected as part of a community survey of mental health in Ukraine. Individual symptom endorsements for the IGQ significantly decreased with the use of clinical checks, and the percentage of the sample that met the ICD-11 diagnostic requirements for PGD fell from 13.6% to 10.2%, representing a 24.8% reduction in cases. The value and potential broader application of clinical checks are discussed.

Journal of Traumatic StressVol. 38(1)
Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Tajikistan (TJ), University of Ulster (GB), National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), Queens University (BD), National Center for PTSD (US), Ministry of Health (UA), Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NO), University College London (GB), Ariel University (IL), Bogomolets National Medical University (UA), Stanford University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.