Agricultural Economic Water Productivity Differences across Counties in the Colorado River Basin

This study estimates the relative contribution of different factors to the wide variation in agricultural economic water productivity (EWP) across Colorado River Basin counties. It updates EWP measures for Basin counties using more detailed, localized data for the Colorado River mainstem. Using the Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion for variable selection, regression analysis and productivity accounting methods identified factors contributing to EWP differences. The EWP was USD 1033 (USD 2023)/acre foot (af) for Lower Basin Counties on the U.S.–Mexico Border, USD 729 (USD 2023)/af for other Lower Basin Counties, and USD 168 (USD 2023)/af for Upper Basin Counties. Adoption rates for improved irrigation technologies showed little inter-county variation and so did not have a statistically significant impact on EWP. Counties with the lowest EWP consumed 25% of the Basin’s agricultural water (>2.3 million af) to generate 3% of the Basin’s crop revenue. Low populations/remoteness and more irrigated acreage per farm were negatively associated with EWP. Warmer winter temperatures and greater July humidity were positively associated with EWP. When controlling for other factors, being on the Border increased a county’s EWP by USD 570 (2023 USD)/af. Border Counties have greater access to labor from Mexico, enabling greater production of high-value, labor-intensive specialty crops.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology
Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology11080125
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agricultural Economic Water Productivity Differences across Counties in the Colorado River Basin

George B. Frisvold, Jyothsna Atla
3 citations
Hydrology
Water resources management and optimization
1.01
article

Agricultural Economic Water Productivity Differences across Counties in the Colorado River Basin

George B. Frisvold, Jyothsna Atla
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study estimates the relative contribution of different factors to the wide variation in agricultural economic water productivity (EWP) across Colorado River Basin counties. It updates EWP measures for Basin counties using more detailed, localized data for the Colorado River mainstem. Using the Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion for variable selection, regression analysis and productivity accounting methods identified factors contributing to EWP differences. The EWP was USD 1033 (USD 2023)/acre foot (af) for Lower Basin Counties on the U.S.–Mexico Border, USD 729 (USD 2023)/af for other Lower Basin Counties, and USD 168 (USD 2023)/af for Upper Basin Counties. Adoption rates for improved irrigation technologies showed little inter-county variation and so did not have a statistically significant impact on EWP. Counties with the lowest EWP consumed 25% of the Basin’s agricultural water (>2.3 million af) to generate 3% of the Basin’s crop revenue. Low populations/remoteness and more irrigated acreage per farm were negatively associated with EWP. Warmer winter temperatures and greater July humidity were positively associated with EWP. When controlling for other factors, being on the Border increased a county’s EWP by USD 570 (2023 USD)/af. Border Counties have greater access to labor from Mexico, enabling greater production of high-value, labor-intensive specialty crops.

HydrologyVol. 11(8)
University of Arizona (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Water resources management and optimization
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.