Study Demands–Resources Theory: Understanding Student Well-Being in Higher Education

Abstract This article reviews the literature on student well-being (burnout and engagement) and their relationships with study demands and resources, student behaviors (proactive and self-undermining study behaviors), and student outcomes in higher education. Building on research that used Job Demands–Resources and Study Demands–Resources models to investigate student well-being, we develop the Study Demands–Resources (SD–R) theory to delineate the various processes, mechanisms, and behaviors involved in student burnout and engagement. Study demands and resources have unique and combined effects on higher education students’ well-being. In addition, students can influence their own well-being and study-related outcomes by either proactively optimizing their study demands and resources or displaying self-undermining behaviors that can adversely affect their study environment. We discuss several avenues for future research, including (a) rigorous tests of SD–R propositions; (b) trait versus state effects in SD–R theory; (c) the impact of the higher education climate and lecturer influence; and (d) an expanded SD–R theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09940-8
Citations
76
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
159.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study Demands–Resources Theory: Understanding Student Well-Being in Higher Education

Arnold B. Bakker, Karina Mostert
76 citations
Educational Psychology Review
Higher Education Research Studies
159.28
article

Study Demands–Resources Theory: Understanding Student Well-Being in Higher Education

Arnold B. Bakker, Karina Mostert
article en
76 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article reviews the literature on student well-being (burnout and engagement) and their relationships with study demands and resources, student behaviors (proactive and self-undermining study behaviors), and student outcomes in higher education. Building on research that used Job Demands–Resources and Study Demands–Resources models to investigate student well-being, we develop the Study Demands–Resources (SD–R) theory to delineate the various processes, mechanisms, and behaviors involved in student burnout and engagement. Study demands and resources have unique and combined effects on higher education students’ well-being. In addition, students can influence their own well-being and study-related outcomes by either proactively optimizing their study demands and resources or displaying self-undermining behaviors that can adversely affect their study environment. We discuss several avenues for future research, including (a) rigorous tests of SD–R propositions; (b) trait versus state effects in SD–R theory; (c) the impact of the higher education climate and lecturer influence; and (d) an expanded SD–R theory.

Educational Psychology ReviewVol. 36(3)
North-West University (ZA), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Higher Education Research Studies
159.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Study Demands–Resources Theory: Understanding Student Well-Being in Higher Education — Arnold B. Bakker, Karina Mostert · Educational Psychology Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS