Item reduction of the “Support Intensity Scale” for people with intellectual disabilities, using machine learning

Abstract Background The study focuses on the need to optimise assessment scales for support needs in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Current scales are often lengthy and redundant, leading to exhaustion and response burden. The goal is to use machine learning techniques, specifically item‐reduction methods and selection algorithms, to develop shorter and more efficient scales. Methods A data set of 93 participants was analysed using the Supports Needs Scale. Five feature‐selection algorithms were evaluated to create a shortened questionnaire. For each algorithm, a Random Forest model was trained, and performance was assessed using metrics like accuracy, precision, recall and F1‐score to measure how well each model predicted support needs. Findings The "Select from Model" algorithm successfully identified key items that could predict the level of Support Needs using the Random Forest model. Only 51 variables, out of the original 147, were needed to maintain predictive accuracy. The reduced questionnaire maintained good reliability and internal consistency compared to the original instrument, with a strong F1 score indicating excellent predictive performance. Conclusions The study demonstrates that machine learning techniques are effective in reducing the length of support needs questionnaires while preserving their psychometric properties. These methods can help institutions provide more efficient access to information about support needs without compromising validity or reliability, potentially leading to better resource allocation and improved care for individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12616
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Item reduction of the “Support Intensity Scale” for people with intellectual disabilities, using machine learning

Izaskun Álvarez‐Aguado, Félix González‐Carrasco, Miguel Roselló‐Peñaloza, Vanessa Vega Córdova et al.
2 citations
British Journal of Learning Disabilities
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
1.09
article

Item reduction of the “Support Intensity Scale” for people with intellectual disabilities, using machine learning

Izaskun Álvarez‐Aguado, Félix González‐Carrasco, Miguel Roselló‐Peñaloza, Vanessa Vega Córdova, Felipe Espinosa Parra, Sebastián Ponce Olguín
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The study focuses on the need to optimise assessment scales for support needs in individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Current scales are often lengthy and redundant, leading to exhaustion and response burden. The goal is to use machine learning techniques, specifically item‐reduction methods and selection algorithms, to develop shorter and more efficient scales. Methods A data set of 93 participants was analysed using the Supports Needs Scale. Five feature‐selection algorithms were evaluated to create a shortened questionnaire. For each algorithm, a Random Forest model was trained, and performance was assessed using metrics like accuracy, precision, recall and F1‐score to measure how well each model predicted support needs. Findings The "Select from Model" algorithm successfully identified key items that could predict the level of Support Needs using the Random Forest model. Only 51 variables, out of the original 147, were needed to maintain predictive accuracy. The reduced questionnaire maintained good reliability and internal consistency compared to the original instrument, with a strong F1 score indicating excellent predictive performance. Conclusions The study demonstrates that machine learning techniques are effective in reducing the length of support needs questionnaires while preserving their psychometric properties. These methods can help institutions provide more efficient access to information about support needs without compromising validity or reliability, potentially leading to better resource allocation and improved care for individuals with intellectual disabilities.

British Journal of Learning DisabilitiesVol. 53(1)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL), Millennium Science Initiative (CL), University of the Americas (CL), University of Valparaíso (CL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.