Promoting the implementation of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention: development and feasibility testing of an implementation intervention

The current study highlights the importance of a thorough feasibility study in addition to the use of IM. Although feasibility results may have demonstrated that stakeholders broadly accepted the implementation intervention, implementation determinants did not change favorably, and stakeholders had no plans to continue the PA intervention. Yet, choices made during the development of the implementation intervention (i.e. the operationalization of Implementation Mapping) might not have been optimal. The current study describes important lessons learned when developing an implementation intervention, and provides recommendations for developers of future implementation interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Implementation Science Communications
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00622-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Promoting the implementation of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention: development and feasibility testing of an implementation intervention

Femke van Nassau, Denise A. Peels, Brenda Berendsen, Lilian Lechner et al.
2 citations
Implementation Science Communications
Health Policy Implementation Science
1.70
article

Promoting the implementation of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention: development and feasibility testing of an implementation intervention

Femke van Nassau, Denise A. Peels, Brenda Berendsen, Lilian Lechner, Catherine Bolman, Janet M. Boekhout
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The current study highlights the importance of a thorough feasibility study in addition to the use of IM. Although feasibility results may have demonstrated that stakeholders broadly accepted the implementation intervention, implementation determinants did not change favorably, and stakeholders had no plans to continue the PA intervention. Yet, choices made during the development of the implementation intervention (i.e. the operationalization of Implementation Mapping) might not have been optimal. The current study describes important lessons learned when developing an implementation intervention, and provides recommendations for developers of future implementation interventions.

Implementation Science CommunicationsVol. 5(1)
Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Open University of the Netherlands (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
ZonMw, Fonds NutsOhra
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Health Policy Implementation Science
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.