Evaluation of social risks in large-scale infrastructure projects in India – a comparative study using relational and traditional approaches
Large-scale infrastructure projects (LSIPs) are characterized by huge costs, high complexity, a high propensity for risks, and a long-lasting impact on the environment and society. While past researchers have extensively studied project risk and associated issues, much less is explored about social risks, a particular category of risks rooted in the social contexts of the LSIPs. The gap is starker in the context of developing countries. To address this gap in knowledge, a network analysis approach is used to explore various social risks and their interdependencies in LSIPs in India. Data was collected from 23 risk management experts working in Indian LSIPs through a matrix-based questionnaire and subsequent interviews. A Social network analysis (SNA) of the social risk interactions identified labor unrest, environmental pollution, and public resistance as the most critical in LSIPs. The SNA-based risk criticality scores were also compared with the traditional probability-impact-based risk perception scores, and divergence of the results was observed. The study concludes by suggesting an actionable social-risk mitigation framework. The findings provide insights on the social risk interaction patterns and emphasize the importance of taking a relational perspective in conjunction with the traditional probability-impact-based view while assessing such risks in LSIPs.
Authors
- Aritra Halder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-6306)
- Gobinda Barik
- Atul Bhardwaj
Institutions
- Bechtel (United States) (US)
- National Institute of Construction Management and Research (IN)
- China State Construction Engineering (China) (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Construction Management
- Published
- 2024-08-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2024.2389596
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Construction Project Management and Performance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.96