Evaluating the effects of geographic adjustments on poverty measures using self‐reported financial well‐being

Abstract A central aspect of poverty measurement is identifying the people and places experiencing financial hardships. This paper explores this relationship using the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Financial Well‐Being Scale, which reflects individuals’ self‐assessments of financial challenges. Using this measure, for every 1 percentage point increase in a state's official poverty rate for working‐age adults, there is a 0.59 percentage point increase in the share with low financial well‐being. In contrast, the supplemental poverty rate is negatively correlated with the financial hardship using the CFPB measure. This reflects the supplemental poverty measure's geographic adjustment shifting poverty towards areas with lower rates of financial hardship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22633
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the effects of geographic adjustments on poverty measures using self‐reported financial well‐being

Jeff Larrimore
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Evaluating the effects of geographic adjustments on poverty measures using self‐reported financial well‐being

Jeff Larrimore
article en

Abstract

Abstract A central aspect of poverty measurement is identifying the people and places experiencing financial hardships. This paper explores this relationship using the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Financial Well‐Being Scale, which reflects individuals’ self‐assessments of financial challenges. Using this measure, for every 1 percentage point increase in a state's official poverty rate for working‐age adults, there is a 0.59 percentage point increase in the share with low financial well‐being. In contrast, the supplemental poverty rate is negatively correlated with the financial hardship using the CFPB measure. This reflects the supplemental poverty measure's geographic adjustment shifting poverty towards areas with lower rates of financial hardship.

Journal of Policy Analysis and ManagementVol. 44(1)
Federal Reserve Board of Governors (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.