Prenatal Screening of Chromosomal Anomalies Using Genome-Wide or Target Cell-Free DNA: Preferences and Satisfaction of Pregnant Women

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a non-invasive prenatal test used to screen for common trisomies (target cfDNA) that can be expanded to assess all autosomal chromosomes (genome-wide cfDNA). As cfDNA testing gains popularity, it is crucial to examine the factors influencing the decision-making process of pregnant individuals when choosing between these two approaches. <b>Methods</b>: In this prospective cohort study, 190 individuals undergoing cfDNA testing for aneuploidy screening, according to the current screening protocol, were allowed to make their own choice between target and genome-wide cfDNA testing. They were asked to complete a first survey at 11-13 weeks, designed to explore their characteristics, preferences, and satisfaction with the prenatal genetic counseling session, as well as a Decisional Conflict Scale. A postnatal survey was administered three months after delivery, including the Decisional Regret Scale and two open questions. <b>Results</b>: 84% of participants opted for genome-wide cfDNA. However, 17% found the decision challenging, and 14% felt that the results might increase anxiety. No significant differences in participant characteristics were found when comparing decisions between genome-wide and target cfDNA. However, significant differences were observed regarding ethnicity (<i>p</i> = <0.001), educational level (<i>p</i> = 0.029), previous cfDNA experience (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and having sufficient information when comparing termination options (<i>p</i> = 0.002). After delivery, only 4% would have changed their decision. <b>Conclusions</b>: Individuals, regardless of their characteristics, prefer genome-wide cfDNA; however, the complexity of the results necessitates enhanced genetic education for prenatal care clinicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164888
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prenatal Screening of Chromosomal Anomalies Using Genome-Wide or Target Cell-Free DNA: Preferences and Satisfaction of Pregnant Women

A. Borrell, Irene Madrigal, Montse Pauta, R. Roca de Viñals et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
2.22
article

Prenatal Screening of Chromosomal Anomalies Using Genome-Wide or Target Cell-Free DNA: Preferences and Satisfaction of Pregnant Women

A. Borrell, Irene Madrigal, Montse Pauta, R. Roca de Viñals, Victoria Ardiles‐Ruesjas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a non-invasive prenatal test used to screen for common trisomies (target cfDNA) that can be expanded to assess all autosomal chromosomes (genome-wide cfDNA). As cfDNA testing gains popularity, it is crucial to examine the factors influencing the decision-making process of pregnant individuals when choosing between these two approaches. <b>Methods</b>: In this prospective cohort study, 190 individuals undergoing cfDNA testing for aneuploidy screening, according to the current screening protocol, were allowed to make their own choice between target and genome-wide cfDNA testing. They were asked to complete a first survey at 11-13 weeks, designed to explore their characteristics, preferences, and satisfaction with the prenatal genetic counseling session, as well as a Decisional Conflict Scale. A postnatal survey was administered three months after delivery, including the Decisional Regret Scale and two open questions. <b>Results</b>: 84% of participants opted for genome-wide cfDNA. However, 17% found the decision challenging, and 14% felt that the results might increase anxiety. No significant differences in participant characteristics were found when comparing decisions between genome-wide and target cfDNA. However, significant differences were observed regarding ethnicity (<i>p</i> = <0.001), educational level (<i>p</i> = 0.029), previous cfDNA experience (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and having sufficient information when comparing termination options (<i>p</i> = 0.002). After delivery, only 4% would have changed their decision. <b>Conclusions</b>: Individuals, regardless of their characteristics, prefer genome-wide cfDNA; however, the complexity of the results necessitates enhanced genetic education for prenatal care clinicians.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(16)
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Fundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona-Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
2.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.