Feminist approaches to environmental politics

Ecofeminism as scholarship and practice continues to polarize, draw criticism, and inspire scholarly works and politics that account for the structures of domination that perpetuate sexism and ecological exploitation. Ecofeminist scholarship grew in volume and prominence in the 1970s and 1980s but began to falter under the weight of critiques that the approach upheld gender essentialism and a white western feminism that does not account for the needs, views, politics, and orientations to the planet outside of the global north. And yet, ecofeminism still holds relevance and offers significant perspectives and tools that can respond to these important criticisms and offer key insights in the ongoing efforts to address climate change and environmental and gender injustices. As a conversation among scholars working in ecofeminist political thought, this Critical Exchange asks about the contemporary relevance of this tradition to their approach as scholars, inside and outside of the academy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Political Theory
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-024-00707-y
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.83
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feminist approaches to environmental politics

Hannah Battersby, Cara Daggett, Isabel Altamirano‐Jiménez, Heather Urquhart et al.
4 citations
Contemporary Political Theory
Geographies of human-animal interactions
7.83
article

Feminist approaches to environmental politics

Hannah Battersby, Cara Daggett, Isabel Altamirano‐Jiménez, Heather Urquhart, Magdalena S. Rodekirchen, Emily Ray, Sherilyn MacGregor, Sarah Wiebe, Jennifer L. Lawrence
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Ecofeminism as scholarship and practice continues to polarize, draw criticism, and inspire scholarly works and politics that account for the structures of domination that perpetuate sexism and ecological exploitation. Ecofeminist scholarship grew in volume and prominence in the 1970s and 1980s but began to falter under the weight of critiques that the approach upheld gender essentialism and a white western feminism that does not account for the needs, views, politics, and orientations to the planet outside of the global north. And yet, ecofeminism still holds relevance and offers significant perspectives and tools that can respond to these important criticisms and offer key insights in the ongoing efforts to address climate change and environmental and gender injustices. As a conversation among scholars working in ecofeminist political thought, this Critical Exchange asks about the contemporary relevance of this tradition to their approach as scholars, inside and outside of the academy.

Contemporary Political TheoryVol. 24(1)
University of Alberta (CA), Sonoma State University (US), University of Victoria (CA), University of Manchester (GB), University of Virginia (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
7.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Feminist approaches to environmental politics — Hannah Battersby, Cara Daggett, et al. · Contemporary Political Theory (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS