One Health in two countries: The politics of transdisciplinary healthcare collaboration in Canada and the United States

The One Health perspective highlights the potential synergies between the human, animal, and environmental health sciences, especially in an era of budget shortfalls, climate change, and emerging infectious diseases of zoonotic origin. Canadian physicians and veterinarians arguably lay the foundation of One Health in the late 19<sup>th</sup> century, when they pioneered the study of "comparative medicine" in Montreal, but they fell into disciplinary silos before World War I to the lasting detriment of the Canadian population. This article explores both the advantages and impediments to cross-disciplinary healthcare collaboration in Canada, highlighting the country's vast size, sparse population, and political decentralization in particular, and offers a number of policy recommendations that would allow the country to reclaim its rightful role as a leader in the One Health movement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare Management Forum
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704241271316
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Health in two countries: The politics of transdisciplinary healthcare collaboration in Canada and the United States

Andrew Schrank
Healthcare Management Forum
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

One Health in two countries: The politics of transdisciplinary healthcare collaboration in Canada and the United States

Andrew Schrank
article en

Abstract

The One Health perspective highlights the potential synergies between the human, animal, and environmental health sciences, especially in an era of budget shortfalls, climate change, and emerging infectious diseases of zoonotic origin. Canadian physicians and veterinarians arguably lay the foundation of One Health in the late 19<sup>th</sup> century, when they pioneered the study of "comparative medicine" in Montreal, but they fell into disciplinary silos before World War I to the lasting detriment of the Canadian population. This article explores both the advantages and impediments to cross-disciplinary healthcare collaboration in Canada, highlighting the country's vast size, sparse population, and political decentralization in particular, and offers a number of policy recommendations that would allow the country to reclaim its rightful role as a leader in the One Health movement.

Healthcare Management ForumVol. 37(6)
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA), Brown University (US)
Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

One Health in two countries: The politics of transdisciplinary healthcare collaboration in Canada and the United States — Andrew Schrank · Healthcare Management Forum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS