Single-layer tensor network approach for three-dimensional quantum systems

Calculation of observables with three-dimensional projected entangled pair states is generally hard, as it requires a contraction of complex multi-layer tensor networks. We utilize the multi-layer structure of these tensor networks to largely simplify the contraction. The proposed approach involves the usage of the layer structure both to simplify the search for the boundary projected entangled pair states and the single-layer mapping of the final corner transfer matrix renormalization group contraction. We benchmark our results on the cubic lattice Heisenberg model, reaching the bond dimension <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mi>D</a:mi><a:mo>=</a:mo><a:mn>7</a:mn></a:mrow></a:math>, and find a good agreement with the previous results. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.110.064422
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Quantum many-body systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Single-layer tensor network approach for three-dimensional quantum systems

I. V. Lukin, Andrii Sotnikov
4 citations
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Quantum many-body systems
1.35
article

Single-layer tensor network approach for three-dimensional quantum systems

I. V. Lukin, Andrii Sotnikov
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Calculation of observables with three-dimensional projected entangled pair states is generally hard, as it requires a contraction of complex multi-layer tensor networks. We utilize the multi-layer structure of these tensor networks to largely simplify the contraction. The proposed approach involves the usage of the layer structure both to simplify the search for the boundary projected entangled pair states and the single-layer mapping of the final corner transfer matrix renormalization group contraction. We benchmark our results on the cubic lattice Heisenberg model, reaching the bond dimension <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mi>D</a:mi><a:mo>=</a:mo><a:mn>7</a:mn></a:mrow></a:math>, and find a good agreement with the previous results. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Physical review. B./Physical review. BVol. 110(6)
V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (UA)
National Research Foundation of Ukraine
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Quantum many-body systems
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Single-layer tensor network approach for three-dimensional quantum systems — I. V. Lukin, Andrii Sotnikov · Physical review. B./Physical review. B (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS