Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Lead Adsorbates on Al<sub>13</sub>Co<sub>4</sub>(100): Accurate Potential Energy Surfaces at Low Computational Cost by Machine Learning and DFT-Based Data

Intermetallic compounds are promising materials in numerous fields, especially those involving surface interactions, such as catalysis. A key factor to investigate their surface properties lies in adsorption energy maps, typically built using first-principles approaches. However, exploring the adsorption energy landscapes of intermetallic compounds can be cumbersome, usually requiring huge computational resources. In this work, we propose an efficient method to predict adsorption energies, based on a Machine Learning (ML) scheme fed by a few Density Functional Theory (DFT) estimates performed on <i>n</i> sites selected through the Farthest Point Sampling (FPS) process. We detail its application on the Al<sub>13</sub>Co<sub>4</sub>(100) quasicrystalline approximant surface for several atomic adsorbates (H, O, and Pb). On this specific example, our approach is shown to outperform both simple interpolation strategies and the recent ML force field MACE [arXiv.2206.07697], especially when the number <i>n</i> is small, i.e., below 36 sites. The ground-truth DFT adsorption energies are much more correlated with the predicted FPS-ML estimates (Pearson R-factor of 0.71, 0.73, and 0.90 for H, O and Pb, respectively, when <i>n</i> = 36) than with interpolation-based or MACE-ML ones (Pearson R-factors of 0.43, 0.39, and 0.56 for H, O, and Pb, in the former case and 0.22, 0.35, and 0.63 in the latter case). The unbiased root-mean-square error (ubRMSE) is lower for FPS-ML than for interpolation-based and MACE-ML predictions (0.15, 0.17, and 0.17 eV, respectively, for hydrogen and 0.17, 0.25, and 0.22 eV for lead), except for oxygen (0.55, 0.47, and 0.46 eV) due to large surface relaxations in this case. We believe that these findings and the corresponding methodology can be extended to a wide range of systems, which will motivate the discovery of novel functional materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00367
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Lead Adsorbates on Al13Co4(100): Accurate Potential Energy Surfaces at Low Computational Cost by Machine Learning and DFT-Based Data

Florian Brix, Émilie Gaudry, Frédéric Sur, Nathan Boulangeot
1 citations
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Machine Learning in Materials Science
0.12
article

Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Lead Adsorbates on Al13Co4(100): Accurate Potential Energy Surfaces at Low Computational Cost by Machine Learning and DFT-Based Data

Florian Brix, Émilie Gaudry, Frédéric Sur, Nathan Boulangeot
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Intermetallic compounds are promising materials in numerous fields, especially those involving surface interactions, such as catalysis. A key factor to investigate their surface properties lies in adsorption energy maps, typically built using first-principles approaches. However, exploring the adsorption energy landscapes of intermetallic compounds can be cumbersome, usually requiring huge computational resources. In this work, we propose an efficient method to predict adsorption energies, based on a Machine Learning (ML) scheme fed by a few Density Functional Theory (DFT) estimates performed on <i>n</i> sites selected through the Farthest Point Sampling (FPS) process. We detail its application on the Al<sub>13</sub>Co<sub>4</sub>(100) quasicrystalline approximant surface for several atomic adsorbates (H, O, and Pb). On this specific example, our approach is shown to outperform both simple interpolation strategies and the recent ML force field MACE [arXiv.2206.07697], especially when the number <i>n</i> is small, i.e., below 36 sites. The ground-truth DFT adsorption energies are much more correlated with the predicted FPS-ML estimates (Pearson R-factor of 0.71, 0.73, and 0.90 for H, O and Pb, respectively, when <i>n</i> = 36) than with interpolation-based or MACE-ML ones (Pearson R-factors of 0.43, 0.39, and 0.56 for H, O, and Pb, in the former case and 0.22, 0.35, and 0.63 in the latter case). The unbiased root-mean-square error (ubRMSE) is lower for FPS-ML than for interpolation-based and MACE-ML predictions (0.15, 0.17, and 0.17 eV, respectively, for hydrogen and 0.17, 0.25, and 0.22 eV for lead), except for oxygen (0.55, 0.47, and 0.46 eV) due to large surface relaxations in this case. We believe that these findings and the corresponding methodology can be extended to a wide range of systems, which will motivate the discovery of novel functional materials.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR), Aarhus University (DK), Laboratoire Lorrain de Recherche en Informatique et ses Applications (FR), Institut Jean Lamour (FR), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Université de Lorraine, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif, European Regional Development Fund
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.