CHARACTERISTICS OF DAMAGE TO BUILDINGS WITH DIFFERENT STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AS A RESULT OF MILITARY ACTIONS

The article presents current problems in theanalysis and generalization of data concerningdestroyed or damaged buildings in various cities ofUkraine during 2022-2024. The relevance of the workis determined by the importance of structuring andsystematizing approaches to the analysis of buildingdamage or destruction. The research provides areview of works and publications concerning theinspection and mitigation of consequences followingthe explosive impact on a building. For visualcomparison and data generalization, cases of damageand destruction of building structures with varioustypes of construction systems were considered.The main goal of the load-bearing structures ofa building subjected to explosive impacts is toensure its overall survivability, i.e., the ability topreserve minimal load-bearing capacity and preventprogressive collapse. Different structural systemsarchive this goal differently. Panel buildings areprone to progressive collapse, which in turn leads tosignificant casualties among the civilian population.In brick buildings, with a significant explosive waveforce, the overall stability of load-bearing walls canbe lost, potentially leading to progressive collapse.Single-story industrial-type frame buildings sufferdevastating consequences from impacts, especiallyif the detonation of ammunition causes subsequentfires. Due to the large area of ignition, the fires aredifficult to localize. Monolithic framework buildingsdemonstrate the best performance. In Kyiv andChernihiv, such buildings were hit by aerialbombs and missiles but remained standing despitesignificant damage and destruction of vertical andhorizontal load-bearing elements. At the same time,even damaged buildings maintain resistance toprogressive collapse due to the redistribution offorces within the structures. It should be noted thatbuildings of any structural system can be restored,depending on the extent of damage, feasibility, andcost-effectiveness of restoration. To find the beststructural solutions for buildings, a detailed analysisof existing damages and destructions in variousbuildings is necessary. In the future, this will be adetermining factor in developing and implementingchanges to existing design codes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and construction
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33644/2313-6679-2-2024-6
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CHARACTERISTICS OF DAMAGE TO BUILDINGS WITH DIFFERENT STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AS A RESULT OF MILITARY ACTIONS

Science and construction
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

CHARACTERISTICS OF DAMAGE TO BUILDINGS WITH DIFFERENT STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AS A RESULT OF MILITARY ACTIONS

article en

Abstract

The article presents current problems in theanalysis and generalization of data concerningdestroyed or damaged buildings in various cities ofUkraine during 2022-2024. The relevance of the workis determined by the importance of structuring andsystematizing approaches to the analysis of buildingdamage or destruction. The research provides areview of works and publications concerning theinspection and mitigation of consequences followingthe explosive impact on a building. For visualcomparison and data generalization, cases of damageand destruction of building structures with varioustypes of construction systems were considered.The main goal of the load-bearing structures ofa building subjected to explosive impacts is toensure its overall survivability, i.e., the ability topreserve minimal load-bearing capacity and preventprogressive collapse. Different structural systemsarchive this goal differently. Panel buildings areprone to progressive collapse, which in turn leads tosignificant casualties among the civilian population.In brick buildings, with a significant explosive waveforce, the overall stability of load-bearing walls canbe lost, potentially leading to progressive collapse.Single-story industrial-type frame buildings sufferdevastating consequences from impacts, especiallyif the detonation of ammunition causes subsequentfires. Due to the large area of ignition, the fires aredifficult to localize. Monolithic framework buildingsdemonstrate the best performance. In Kyiv andChernihiv, such buildings were hit by aerialbombs and missiles but remained standing despitesignificant damage and destruction of vertical andhorizontal load-bearing elements. At the same time,even damaged buildings maintain resistance toprogressive collapse due to the redistribution offorces within the structures. It should be noted thatbuildings of any structural system can be restored,depending on the extent of damage, feasibility, andcost-effectiveness of restoration. To find the beststructural solutions for buildings, a detailed analysisof existing damages and destructions in variousbuildings is necessary. In the future, this will be adetermining factor in developing and implementingchanges to existing design codes.

Science and constructionVol. 40(2)
Max Planck Society (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

CHARACTERISTICS OF DAMAGE TO BUILDINGS WITH DIFFERENT STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AS A RESULT OF MILITARY ACTIONS · Science and construction (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS