Could Robots Become Religious? Theological, Evolutionary, and Cognitive Perspectives

If artificial intelligence (AI) programs start manifesting religious interest or behavior, how could we know whether it is genuine? This article explores the necessary conditions for robots to develop authentic religiosity from theological, evolutionary, and cognitive angles. Theology is more open to the hypothesis of religious robots than naturalistic approaches, which regard the emergence of human religion as highly contingent on the idiosyncrasies of our embodiment, needs, cognition, and evolutionary history. Drawing on Robin Dunbar’s work and educated guesses about the mental world of future AI, I argue that common human intuition about potential robot religiosity—as captured in sci-fi and pop culture—is plagued by two fallacies: (1) a bias to equating religion with only its intellectual or doctrinal layer at the expense of the embodied, shamanistic dimension, and (2) a naïve assumption that intelligent robots will develop humanlike thoughts, aspirations, and concerns. Due to its alien type of intelligence, AI will likely not engage in something so typically human as religion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zygon®
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/zygon.16902
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Could Robots Become Religious? Theological, Evolutionary, and Cognitive Perspectives

Marius Dorobantu
3 citations
Zygon®
Intellectual Property Law
12.22
article

Could Robots Become Religious? Theological, Evolutionary, and Cognitive Perspectives

Marius Dorobantu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

If artificial intelligence (AI) programs start manifesting religious interest or behavior, how could we know whether it is genuine? This article explores the necessary conditions for robots to develop authentic religiosity from theological, evolutionary, and cognitive angles. Theology is more open to the hypothesis of religious robots than naturalistic approaches, which regard the emergence of human religion as highly contingent on the idiosyncrasies of our embodiment, needs, cognition, and evolutionary history. Drawing on Robin Dunbar’s work and educated guesses about the mental world of future AI, I argue that common human intuition about potential robot religiosity—as captured in sci-fi and pop culture—is plagued by two fallacies: (1) a bias to equating religion with only its intellectual or doctrinal layer at the expense of the embodied, shamanistic dimension, and (2) a naïve assumption that intelligent robots will develop humanlike thoughts, aspirations, and concerns. Due to its alien type of intelligence, AI will likely not engage in something so typically human as religion.

Zygon®Vol. 59(3)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Templeton World Charity Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Intellectual Property Law
12.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.