Challenges in Lipidomics Biomarker Identification: Avoiding the Pitfalls and Improving Reproducibility

Identification of features with high levels of confidence in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) lipidomics research is an essential part of biomarker discovery, but existing software platforms can give inconsistent results, even from identical spectral data. This poses a clear challenge for reproducibility in biomarker identification. In this work, we illustrate the reproducibility gap for two open-access lipidomics platforms, MS DIAL and Lipostar, finding just 14.0% identification agreement when analyzing identical LC-MS spectra using default settings. Whilst the software platforms performed more consistently using fragmentation data, agreement was still only 36.1% for MS<sup>2</sup> spectra. This highlights the critical importance of validation across positive and negative LC-MS modes, as well as the manual curation of spectra and lipidomics software outputs, in order to reduce identification errors caused by closely related lipids and co-elution issues. This curation process can be supplemented by data-driven outlier detection in assessing spectral outputs, which is demonstrated here using a novel machine learning approach based on support vector machine regression combined with leave-one-out cross-validation. These steps are essential to reduce the frequency of false positive identifications and close the reproducibility gap, including between software platforms, which, for downstream users such as bioinformaticians and clinicians, can be an underappreciated source of biomarker identification errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metabolites
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo14080461
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges in Lipidomics Biomarker Identification: Avoiding the Pitfalls and Improving Reproducibility

Anthony Onoja, Lee A. Gethings, Melanie Jane Bailey, Kyle L. Saunders et al.
16 citations
Metabolites
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
3.74
article

Challenges in Lipidomics Biomarker Identification: Avoiding the Pitfalls and Improving Reproducibility

Anthony Onoja, Lee A. Gethings, Melanie Jane Bailey, Kyle L. Saunders, Johanna von Gerichten, Matt Spick, Nophar Geifman
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Identification of features with high levels of confidence in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) lipidomics research is an essential part of biomarker discovery, but existing software platforms can give inconsistent results, even from identical spectral data. This poses a clear challenge for reproducibility in biomarker identification. In this work, we illustrate the reproducibility gap for two open-access lipidomics platforms, MS DIAL and Lipostar, finding just 14.0% identification agreement when analyzing identical LC-MS spectra using default settings. Whilst the software platforms performed more consistently using fragmentation data, agreement was still only 36.1% for MS<sup>2</sup> spectra. This highlights the critical importance of validation across positive and negative LC-MS modes, as well as the manual curation of spectra and lipidomics software outputs, in order to reduce identification errors caused by closely related lipids and co-elution issues. This curation process can be supplemented by data-driven outlier detection in assessing spectral outputs, which is demonstrated here using a novel machine learning approach based on support vector machine regression combined with leave-one-out cross-validation. These steps are essential to reduce the frequency of false positive identifications and close the reproducibility gap, including between software platforms, which, for downstream users such as bioinformaticians and clinicians, can be an underappreciated source of biomarker identification errors.

MetabolitesVol. 14(8)
University of Surrey (GB), Waters (United Kingdom) (GB)
Directorate for Biological Sciences, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
3.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.