Publishers lack AI chatbot policies

Many scholarly publishers still don’t have policies on whether researchers can submit papers written by artificial intelligence chatbots like ChatGPT . Jeremy Y. Ng, a metascientist who works at the Centre for Journalology at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and colleagues audited the publicly available policies of 163 members of the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM). Of those 163 members, only 56 had a policy on whether authors can submit papers written by AI chatbots (medRxiv 2024, DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.19.24309148 ). Forty-nine of those 56 publishers required authors to declare when they used chatbots, and none allowed researchers to list AI tools like ChatGPT as an author. “The use of AI chatbots in academic publishing is a new and rapidly evolving space,” Ng says. “The absence of industry-wide standards or guidelines also contributes to the slow adoption.” The American Chemical Society and the Royal Society of Chemistry,

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
C&EN Global Enterprise
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-10225-polcon1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Publishers lack AI chatbot policies

special to C EN Dalmeet Singh Chawla
C&EN Global Enterprise
AI in Service Interactions
article

Publishers lack AI chatbot policies

special to C EN Dalmeet Singh Chawla
article en

Abstract

Many scholarly publishers still don’t have policies on whether researchers can submit papers written by artificial intelligence chatbots like ChatGPT . Jeremy Y. Ng, a metascientist who works at the Centre for Journalology at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and colleagues audited the publicly available policies of 163 members of the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM). Of those 163 members, only 56 had a policy on whether authors can submit papers written by AI chatbots (medRxiv 2024, DOI: 10.1101/2024.06.19.24309148 ). Forty-nine of those 56 publishers required authors to declare when they used chatbots, and none allowed researchers to list AI tools like ChatGPT as an author. “The use of AI chatbots in academic publishing is a new and rapidly evolving space,” Ng says. “The absence of industry-wide standards or guidelines also contributes to the slow adoption.” The American Chemical Society and the Royal Society of Chemistry,

C&EN Global EnterpriseVol. 102(25)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Publishers lack AI chatbot policies — special to C EN Dalmeet Singh Chawla · C&EN Global Enterprise (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS