Small Error Algorithms for Tropical Group Testing

We consider a version of the classical group testing problem motivated by PCR testing for COVID-19. In the so-called tropical group testing model, the outcome of a test is the lowest cycle threshold (Ct) level of the individuals pooled within it, rather than a simple binary indicator variable. We introduce the tropical counterparts of three classical non-adaptive algorithms (COMP, DD and SCOMP), and analyse their behaviour through both simulations and bounds on error probabilities. By comparing the results of the tropical and classical algorithms, we gain insight into the extra information provided by learning the outcomes (Ct levels) of the tests. We show that in a limiting regime the tropical COMP algorithm requires as many tests as its classical counterpart, but that for sufficiently dense problems tropical DD can recover more information with fewer tests, and can be viewed as essentially optimal in certain regimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
2024-08-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.2024.3445271
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Small Error Algorithms for Tropical Group Testing

Matthew Aldridge, Oliver Johnson, Vivekanand Paligadu
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
0.35
article

Small Error Algorithms for Tropical Group Testing

Matthew Aldridge, Oliver Johnson, Vivekanand Paligadu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

We consider a version of the classical group testing problem motivated by PCR testing for COVID-19. In the so-called tropical group testing model, the outcome of a test is the lowest cycle threshold (Ct) level of the individuals pooled within it, rather than a simple binary indicator variable. We introduce the tropical counterparts of three classical non-adaptive algorithms (COMP, DD and SCOMP), and analyse their behaviour through both simulations and bounds on error probabilities. By comparing the results of the tropical and classical algorithms, we gain insight into the extra information provided by learning the outcomes (Ct levels) of the tests. We show that in a limiting regime the tropical COMP algorithm requires as many tests as its classical counterpart, but that for sufficiently dense problems tropical DD can recover more information with fewer tests, and can be viewed as essentially optimal in certain regimes.

IEEE Transactions on Information TheoryVol. 70(10)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Small Error Algorithms for Tropical Group Testing — Matthew Aldridge, Oliver Johnson, et al. · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS