Optimizing the Service Efficacy of Crowd Ratings in Curbing Fake News Dissemination on Social Media

Curbing the dissemination of fake news in social media has been a major issue in recent years. Previous studies have suggested that the general public can recognize fake news, showing the feasibility of applying crowd ratings to identify fake news. However, the effectiveness of crowd ratings for curbing the dissemination of fake news is uncertain. This study constructed an online experimental platform to simulate Sina Microblog and designed a crowd rating strategy to compare and validate the difference between the absence vs. the presence of crowd ratings, and crowd ratings vs. expert ratings, in curbing the dissemination of fake news. We found that the presence of crowd ratings inhibited users' dissemination of fake news compared to the absence of crowd ratings. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the suppression effects of crowd ratings and expert ratings, both of which were effective in curbing the dissemination of fake news. Crowd rating uses collective intelligence to intervene in users' perceptions and behaviors at the onset of fake news dissemination, providing a cost-effective and efficient solution to combat the spread of fake news on social media.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Crowd Science
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/ijcs.2024.9100020
Citations
3
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.59

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing the Service Efficacy of Crowd Ratings in Curbing Fake News Dissemination on Social Media

Qian Liu, Jian Tang, Weiguo Fan, Yang Lyu
3 citations
International Journal of Crowd Science
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
1.59
article

Optimizing the Service Efficacy of Crowd Ratings in Curbing Fake News Dissemination on Social Media

Qian Liu, Jian Tang, Weiguo Fan, Yang Lyu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Curbing the dissemination of fake news in social media has been a major issue in recent years. Previous studies have suggested that the general public can recognize fake news, showing the feasibility of applying crowd ratings to identify fake news. However, the effectiveness of crowd ratings for curbing the dissemination of fake news is uncertain. This study constructed an online experimental platform to simulate Sina Microblog and designed a crowd rating strategy to compare and validate the difference between the absence vs. the presence of crowd ratings, and crowd ratings vs. expert ratings, in curbing the dissemination of fake news. We found that the presence of crowd ratings inhibited users' dissemination of fake news compared to the absence of crowd ratings. Moreover, there was no significant difference between the suppression effects of crowd ratings and expert ratings, both of which were effective in curbing the dissemination of fake news. Crowd rating uses collective intelligence to intervene in users' perceptions and behaviors at the onset of fake news dissemination, providing a cost-effective and efficient solution to combat the spread of fake news on social media.

International Journal of Crowd ScienceVol. 8(3)
University of Iowa (US), Central University of Finance and Economics (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Central University of Finance and Economics, Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
1.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.